[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Update on Bugzilla migration
Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sat Nov 13 07:34:16 PST 2021
Hello
> Do we feel there could be value in sharing access to this temporary
> GitHub project with a wider audience so we can see how the issues would
> look? This might raise interest and excitement but also might help to
> ensure we don't land something that people find hard to work with.
>
Unfortunately, this is not possible due to GitHub limitations. Before the
real migration the result could only be visible to organization / repo
owners. However, I believe I can provide a few screenshots that showcase
the current results. See attached. Note that "llvmbot" account is used as a
placeholder for the content generated by anyone who did not provide us
bugzilla username => github id mapping.
For example, I'm only interested in a very specific subset of the "bugs"
> (clang-format), how easy will that be for me to see just those. Are
> separate areas just labels? can we filter down to see just the areas we
> want?
>
This was agreed when we discussed the migration roadmap almost 2 years ago:
we use the existing bugzilla products / components and map them to GitHub
labels. Unfortunately, this is quite a manual process as we cannot simply
"flatten" the Product + Component into github labels as we need to clean /
combine and transform the labels. Thanks to Tom now we have the set of 130+
rules how the products / components got mapped to GH labels.
For me I'd like people to specifically log bugs against "clang-format" and
> not the old "Formatter" that it was in bugzilla so I'm interested to
> understand how in the future it might look and if there is any opportunity
> to "clean" the data as we migrate.
>
There are 587 open and 637 closed bugs under "clang-format" label. I cannot
fully use filters on the repo that failed the migration (it seems that the
search index is not built / attached in such case), so I cannot filter
these issues further on based on the content :(
For example do we plan on taking "[clang-format] [clang-tidy] type labels
> from the subject lines and convert them into labels or projects?"
>
No. This was not planned as the format is not stable.
Hope this helps.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211113/6fda81ac/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Crash with empty parameter pack on variadic concept as return type constraint · Issue #48617 · llvm_test7.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 374640 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211113/6fda81ac/attachment-0003.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: attach-braces after enum doesn't, unless allowshortenums is true · Issue #49639 · llvm_test7.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 243376 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211113/6fda81ac/attachment-0004.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Issues · llvm_test7.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 464129 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211113/6fda81ac/attachment-0005.pdf>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list