[llvm-dev] Suggestions on debugging pre-merge test failure that looks irrelevant.

Mingming Liu via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 21 10:11:27 PST 2021


On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 2:35 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:47 PM Mingming Liu via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Geoffrey and James! Very helpful!
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:15 PM James Farrell <jamesfarrell at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I also encountered this error, and got it to go away by passing
> -DLLVM_INCLUDE_GO_TESTS=OFF to cmake.
> >
> >
> > Got it.
> >
> > Just to make sure I'm getting it right, I'll have a one-line change in
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/CMakeLists.txt#L595
> in the patch and revert this line later (which is probably fine in the
> review if it's obvious go tests are not very relevant)
> >>
> >>
> >> -- James
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 3:13 PM Geoffrey Martin-Noble via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The first error you linked is for Bazel, which is not officially
> supported, but you have opted in to the pre-merge checks by joining the
> Bazel phab project. That particular message comes from the tests that
> detect when config files have changed. As you noted, this is due to an old
> baseline for your patch (that was fixed 11 days ago in
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c6cfd385b1). I'd generally
> recommend rebasing to more recent commits before sending something for
> review/testing anyway.
> >>>
> >>> For the second failure, you can see more details about the error in
> the error logs. The raw logs have everything (whereas the buildkite UI only
> shows the last 1MB, as noted at the top). There you can see the output for
> that particular test failure (it takes a minute to load). The relevant bit
> is:
> >>>
> >>>> no required module provides package llvm.org/llvm/bindings/go/llvm:
> go.mod file not found in current directory or any parent directory; see 'go
> help modules'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So it's something about a missing go dependency.
> >
> >
> > I was able to navigate to raw logs and see the same error of missing Go
> dependency now .
> >>>
> >>> I think I've encountered that failure before. It seems flaky. Maybe
> people working on go bindings can help root cause?
> >>>
> >>> Sorry that doesn't answer your meta-question.
> >
> >
> > It's already very helpful to me :-)
> >
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps +Mikhail Goncharov has some ideas for better workflows here
> >
> >
> >  Mikhail, it'd be great if you have some ideas!
> >
> > Also, the option LLVM_INCLUDE_GO_TESTS  was turned on years ago (i.e.,
> not a recent change of enabling Go tests). Retry gives the same error; not
> sure if there are changes on the testing machines (and dunno how to check
> that)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:49 PM Mingming Liu via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>    I'm looking for some suggestions on debugging pre-merge test
> failures that look irrelevant.
> >>>>
> >>>>    Two examples with links (while `ninja check-all` passed for the
> patch, although the DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS doesn't necessarily cover the
> subprojects that fail)
> >>>>    1) This is caused by stale cmake configurations, as indicated by
> the error.
> >>>>         Link of build artifact.
> >>>>         Sync up to pick up new cmake configurations resolved the
> error.
> >>>>
> >>>>    2) Link of build artifact
> >>>>
> >>>>        Test failed with error
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Failed Tests (1):
> >>>>   LLVM :: Bindings/Go/go.test
> >>>>
> >>>>       I didn't find other information in the log that might help.
> >>>>
> >>>>      There is a playbook yet I'm wondering if there are more
> lightweight procedures besides restarting build (e.g., looking at a
> continuous build dashboard


(Probably a little late but just for the record)
https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/llvm-main/builds seems to be a dashboard
to check for continuous build results, so might be a good way to find
existing failures.

> for tests that might already fail or might be flaky before the patch) to
> debug tests that look irrelevant.
>
> The test/Bindings/Go failure was a regression of recent months. (It
> failed enough that I turned off it via -DLLVM_INCLUDE_GO_TESTS=OFF)
> Earlier this year (<=July) I saw that llvm/bindings/go/llvm/ir_test.go
> could catch many issues due to newly introduced attributes.
>
> Cc pcc who initially introduced the binding.
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Mingming
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> >>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> >>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Mingming
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
>
> --
> 宋方睿
>


-- 
Thanks,
Mingming
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211221/2b181579/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list