[llvm-dev] question on LSRInstance::OptimizeLoopTermCond()
Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 23 09:28:46 PDT 2021
Having not scrutinized the code too closely, I bet there's a bunch of code that assumes this optimization has been done and attempts to pattern match for it. If you were to prevent it from running, I bet you'd see a bunch of other optimizations not happen. An easy way to test this is to just comment out the one call to it and see what happens.
That said, if this optimization is not beneficial, perhaps you could add a pass to your backend that does the opposite?
-----Original Message-----
From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Bagel via llvm-dev
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 1:41 PM
To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: [llvm-dev] question on LSRInstance::OptimizeLoopTermCond()
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
This optimization is never useful on my target architecture. There doesn't appear to be a TTI tuning knob to turn it off. Any ideas on how to do that?
Thanks,
brian
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list