[llvm-dev] llvm-dwarfdump stats for inlined functions

[via llvm-dev]

> > >When I wrote D58849 I wasn't sure if all the inlined functions would
> have abstract origins or not; that was one of the things I wanted to check
> on.
> >
> > OK, as Paul mentioned in the previous mail, it might be better if we
> calculated the "#inlined functions without abstract origin".
> 
> If we're keeping the stat anyway, I suspect it's probably not worth
> the hassle of renaming/reving the format/etc. But I don't have strong
> opinions on it.

If there's a database somewhere, probably not worth messing with the
schema.  For reporting to humans, I'd have a slight preference for 
what I said, but it's not a big deal.
--paulr