[llvm-dev] llvm-dwarfdump stats for inlined functions

[Caroline Tice via llvm-dev]

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 4:11 AM Djordje Todorovic <
Djordje.Todorovic at syrmia.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> As discussed on the https://reviews.llvm.org/D101025, we have noticed
> that there are two different stat categories for inlined functions when
> using `llvm-dwarfdump –statistics`:
>
> # inlined functions
>
> # inlined functions with abstract origin
>
> and it was introduced after the *D58849. *We were wondering if there is a
> particular motivation of doing so.
>
>
>

When I wrote D58849 I wasn't sure if all the inlined functions would have
abstract origins or not; that was one of the things I wanted to check on.

-- Caroline
cmtice at google.com


> Having an inlined_subroutine DIE with no abstract_origin attribute does
> not have so many benefits, so it might be better if we have an
> assertion/error (e.g., in the AsmPrinter) when we face such situation (or
> just to avoid dumping it into the final DWARF).
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Djordje
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210428/df10ecdd/attachment.html>