[llvm-dev] [Proposal][Debuginfo] dsymutil-like tool for ELF.
Alexey via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 3 05:15:05 PDT 2020
On 03.09.2020 01:36, David Blaikie wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:26 PM Alexey <avl.lapshin at gmail.com
> <mailto:avl.lapshin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 02.09.2020 21:44, David Blaikie wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:56 AM Alexey <avl.lapshin at gmail.com
>> <mailto:avl.lapshin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01.09.2020 20:07, David Blaikie wrote:
>>> Fair enough - thanks for clarifying the differences! (I'd
>>> still lean a bit towards this being dwz-esque, as you say
>>> "an extension of classic dwz"
>> I doubt a little about "llvm-dwz" since it might confuse
>> people who would expect exactly the same behavior.
>> But if we think of it as "an extension of classic dwz" and
>> the possible confusion is not a big deal then
>> I would be fine with "llvm-dwz".
>>> using a bit more domain knowledge (of terminators and C++
>>> odr - though I'm not sure dsymutil does rely on the ODR,
>>> does it? It relies on it to know that two names represent
>>> the same type, I suppose, but doesn't assume they're already
>>> identical, instead it merges their members))
>>
>> if dsymutil is able to find a full definition then it would
>> remove all other definitions(which matched by name) and set
>> all references to that found definition. If it is not able to
>> find a full definition then it would do nothing. i.e. if
>> there are two incomplete definitions(DW_AT_declaration
>> (true)) with the same name then they would not be merged.
>> That is a possible improvement - to teach dsymutil to merge
>> incomplete types.
>>
>> Huh, what does it do with extra member function definitions found
>> in later definitions? (eg: struct x { template<typename T> void
>> f(); }; - in one translation unit x::f<int> is instantiated, in
>> another x::f<float> is instantiated - how are the two represented
>> with dsymutil?)
>
> They would be considered as two not matched types. dsymutil would
> not merge them somehow and thus would not use single type
> description. There would be two separate types called "x" which
> would have mostly matched members but differ with x::f<int> and
> x::f<float>. No any de-duplication in that case.
>
> Oh, that's unfortunate. It'd be nice for C++ at least, to implement a
> potentially faster dsymutil mode that could get this right and not
> have to actually check for type equivalence, instead relying on the
> name of the type to determine that it must be identical.
Right. That would result in even more size reduction.
>
> The first instance of the type that's encountered has its fully
> qualified name or mangled name recorded in a map pointing to the DIE.
> Any future instance gets downgraded to a declaration, and /certain/
> members get dropped, but other members get stuck on the declaration
> (same sort of DWARF you see with "struct foo { virtual void f1();
> template<typename T> void f2() { } }; void test(foo& f) { f.f2<int>();
> }"). Recording all the member functions of the type/static member
> variable types might be needed in cases where some member functions
> are defined in one translation unit and some defined in another -
> though I guess that infrastructure is already in place/that just works
> today.
My understanding, is that there is not such infrastructure currently.
Current infrastructure allows to reference single existing type
declaration(canonical) from other units. It does not allow to reference
different parts(in different units) of incomplete type.
I think it would be necessary to change the order of how compilation
units are processed to implement such types merging. Currently, after
the compilation unit is analyzed(scanned for types and dead info) it
started to be emitted.
It looks like, to support merging, it would be necessary to analyze all
CUs first(to create canonical representation) and then start to emit them.
I am going to start to work on a prototype of parallel per-compilation
unit implementation of DWARFLinker.
(basing on the scenario which Jonas described in other letter in that
thread).
The types merging could be the next step...
Following is the result of compilation of your example on darwin(showing
that dsymutil does not merge such types):
$ cat struct.h
#ifndef MY_H
#define MY_H
struct foo {
template <class T> int fff () { return sizeof(T); }
};
#endif // MY_H
$ cat mod1.cpp
#include "struct.h"
int test1 ( ) {
foo var;
return var.fff<int>();
}
$ cat mod2.cpp
#include "struct.h"
int test2 ( ) {
foo var;
return var.fff<float>();
}
$ cat main.cpp
#include "struct.h"
int test1();
int test2();
int main ( void ) {
test1();
test2();
return 0;
}
$ clang++ main.cpp mod1.cpp mod2.cpp -O -g -fno-inline
$ llvm-dwarfdump -a a.out.dSYM/Contents/Resources/DWARF/a.out | less
0x00000056: DW_TAG_compile_unit
DW_AT_language (DW_LANG_C_plus_plus)
DW_AT_name ("mod1.cpp")
0x000000ae: DW_TAG_structure_type <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
DW_AT_name ("foo")
DW_AT_byte_size (0x01)
0x000000b7: DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_linkage_name ("_ZN3foo3fffIiEEiv")
DW_AT_name ("fff<int>")
0x0000011f: DW_TAG_compile_unit
DW_AT_language (DW_LANG_C_plus_plus)
DW_AT_name ("mod2.cpp")
0x00000177: DW_TAG_structure_type <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
DW_AT_name ("foo")
DW_AT_byte_size (0x01)
0x00000180: DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_linkage_name ("_ZN3foo3fffIfEEiv")
DW_AT_name ("fff<float>")
>
> - Dave
>
>
>> Alexey.
>>
>>>
>>> But I don't have super strong feelings about the naming.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 6:36 AM Alexey <avl.lapshin at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:avl.lapshin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01.09.2020 06:27, David Blaikie wrote:
>>>> A quick note: The feature as currently proposed sounds
>>>> like it's an exact match for 'dwz'? Is there any
>>>> benefit to this over the existing dwz project? Is it
>>>> different in some ways I'm not aware of? (I haven't
>>>> actually used dwz, so I might have some mistaken ideas
>>>> about how it should work)
>>>>
>>>> If it's going to solve the same general problem, but be
>>>> in the llvm project instead, then maybe it should be
>>>> called llvm-dwz.
>>> It looks like dwz and llvm-dwarfutil are not exactly
>>> matched in functionality.
>>>
>>> dwz is a program that attempts to optimize DWARF
>>> debugging information
>>> contained in ELF shared libraries and ELF executables
>>> for *size*.
>>>
>>> llvm-dwarfutil is a tool that is used for processing debug
>>> info(DWARF) located in built binary files to improve
>>> debug info *quality*,
>>> reduce debug info *size* and accelerate debug info
>>> *processing*.
>>>
>>> Things which are supposed to be done by llvm-dwarfutil
>>> and which are not
>>> done by dwz: removing obsolete debug info, building
>>> indexes, stripping
>>> unneeded debug sections, compress/decompress debug sections.
>>>
>>> Common thing is that both of these tools do debug info
>>> size reduction.
>>> But they do this using different approaches:
>>>
>>> 1. dwz reduces the size of debug info by creating
>>> partial compilation units
>>> for duplicated parts. So that these partial
>>> compilation units could be imported
>>> in every duplicated place. AFAIU, That optimization
>>> gives the most size saving effect.
>>>
>>> another size saving optimization is ODR types
>>> deduplication.
>>>
>>> 2. llvm-dwarfutil reduces the size of debug info by ODR
>>> types deduplication
>>> which gives the most size saving effect in
>>> llvm-dwarfutil case.
>>>
>>> another size saving optimization is removing obsolete
>>> debug info.
>>> (which actually is not only about size but about
>>> correctness also)
>>>
>>> So, it looks like these tools are not equal. If we would
>>> consider that
>>> llvm-dwz is an extension of classic dwz then we could
>>> probably
>>> name it as llvm-dwz.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Though I understand the desire for this to grow other
>>>> functionality, like DWARF-aware dwp-ing. Might be
>>>> better for this to busybox and provide that
>>>> functionality under llvm-dwp instead, or more likely I
>>>> Suspect, that the existing llvm-dwp will be rewritten
>>>> (probably by me) to use more of lld's infrastructure to
>>>> be more efficient (it's current object reading/writing
>>>> logic is using LLVM's libObject and MCStreamer, which
>>>> is a bit inefficient for a very content-unaware linking
>>>> process) and then maybe that could be taught to use
>>>> DwarfLinker as a library to optionally do DWARF-aware
>>>> linking depending on the users time/space tradeoff
>>>> desires. Still benefiting from any improvements to the
>>>> underlying DwarfLinker library (at which point that
>>>> would be shared between llvm-dsymutil, llvm-dwz, and
>>>> llvm-dwp).
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:29 AM Alexey
>>>> <avl.lapshin at gmail.com <mailto:avl.lapshin at gmail.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We propose llvm-dwarfutil - a dsymutil-like tool
>>>> for ELF.
>>>> Any thoughts on this?
>>>> Thanks in advance, Alexey.
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> llvm-dwarfutil(Apndx A) - is a tool that is used
>>>> for processing debug
>>>> info(DWARF)
>>>> located in built binary files to improve debug info
>>>> quality,
>>>> reduce debug info size and accelerate debug info
>>>> processing.
>>>> Supported object files formats: ELF, MachO(Apndx
>>>> B), COFF(Apndx C),
>>>> WASM(Apndx C).
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Specifically, the tool would do:
>>>>
>>>> - Remove obsolete debug info which refers to
>>>> code deleted by the linker
>>>> doing the garbage collection (gc-sections).
>>>>
>>>> - Deduplicate debug type definitions for
>>>> reducing resulting size of
>>>> binary.
>>>>
>>>> - Build accelerator/index tables.
>>>> = .debug_aranges, .debug_names, .gdb_index,
>>>> .debug_pubnames,
>>>> .debug_pubtypes.
>>>>
>>>> - Strip unneeded tables.
>>>> = .debug_aranges, .debug_names, .gdb_index,
>>>> .debug_pubnames,
>>>> .debug_pubtypes.
>>>>
>>>> - Compress or decompress debug info as requested.
>>>>
>>>> Possible feature:
>>>>
>>>> - Join split dwarf .dwo files in a single file
>>>> containing all debug info
>>>> (convert split DWARF into monolithic DWARF).
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> User interface:
>>>>
>>>> OVERVIEW: A tool for optimizing debug info
>>>> located in the built binary.
>>>>
>>>> USAGE: llvm-dwarfutil [options] input output
>>>>
>>>> OPTIONS: (Apndx E)
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Implementation notes:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Removing obsolete debug info would be done using
>>>> DWARFLinker llvm
>>>> library.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Data types deduplication would be done using
>>>> DWARFLinker llvm library.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Accelerator/index tables would be generated
>>>> using DWARFLinker llvm
>>>> library.
>>>>
>>>> 4. Interface of DWARFLinker library would be
>>>> changed in such way that it
>>>> would be possible to switch on/off various stages:
>>>>
>>>> class DWARFLinker {
>>>> setDoRemoveObsoleteInfo ( bool
>>>> DoRemoveObsoleteInfo = false);
>>>>
>>>> setDoAppleNames ( bool DoAppleNames = false );
>>>> setDoAppleNamespaces ( bool DoAppleNamespaces
>>>> = false );
>>>> setDoAppleTypes ( bool DoAppleTypes = false );
>>>> setDoObjC ( bool DoObjC = false );
>>>> setDoDebugPubNames ( bool DoDebugPubNames =
>>>> false );
>>>> setDoDebugPubTypes ( bool DoDebugPubTypes =
>>>> false );
>>>>
>>>> setDoDebugNames (bool DoDebugNames = false);
>>>> setDoGDBIndex (bool DoGDBIndex = false);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> 5. Copying source file contents, stripping tables,
>>>> compressing/decompressing tables
>>>> would be done by ObjCopy llvm library(extracted
>>>> from llvm-objcopy):
>>>>
>>>> Error executeObjcopyOnBinary(const CopyConfig
>>>> &Config,
>>>> object::COFFObjectFile &In, Buffer &Out);
>>>> Error executeObjcopyOnBinary(const CopyConfig
>>>> &Config,
>>>> object::ELFObjectFileBase &In, Buffer &Out);
>>>> Error executeObjcopyOnBinary(const CopyConfig
>>>> &Config,
>>>> object::MachOObjectFile &In, Buffer &Out);
>>>> Error executeObjcopyOnBinary(const CopyConfig
>>>> &Config,
>>>> object::WasmObjectFile &In, Buffer &Out);
>>>>
>>>> 6. Address ranges and single addresses pointing to
>>>> removed code should
>>>> be marked
>>>> with tombstone value in the input file:
>>>>
>>>> -2 for .debug_ranges and .debug_loc.
>>>> -1 for other .debug* tables.
>>>>
>>>> 7. Prototype implementation -
>>>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D86539.
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Roadmap:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Refactor llvm-objcopy to extract it`s
>>>> implementation into separate
>>>> library
>>>> ObjCopy(in LLVM tree).
>>>>
>>>> 2. Create a command line utility using existed
>>>> DWARFLinker and ObjCopy
>>>> implementation. First version is supposed to
>>>> work with only ELF
>>>> input object files.
>>>> It would take input ELF file with unoptimized
>>>> debug info and create
>>>> output
>>>> ELF file with optimized debug info. That
>>>> version would be done out
>>>> of the llvm tree.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Make a tool to be able to work in multi-thread mode.
>>>>
>>>> 4. Consider it to be included into LLVM tree.
>>>>
>>>> 5. Support DWARF5 tables.
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Appendix A. Should this tool be implemented as a
>>>> new tool or as an extension
>>>> to dsymutil/llvm-objcopy?
>>>>
>>>> There already exists a tool which removes
>>>> obsolete debug info on
>>>> darwin - dsymutil.
>>>> Why create another tool instead of extending
>>>> the already existed
>>>> dsymutil/llvm-objcopy?
>>>>
>>>> The main functionality of dsymutil is located
>>>> in a separate library
>>>> - DWARFLinker.
>>>> Thus, dsymutil utility is a command-line
>>>> interface for DWARFLinker.
>>>> dsymutil has
>>>> another type of input/output data: it takes
>>>> several object files and
>>>> address map
>>>> as input and creates a .dSYM bundle with linked
>>>> debug info as
>>>> output. llvm-dwarfutil
>>>> would take a built executable as input and
>>>> create an optimized
>>>> executable as output.
>>>> Additionally, there would be many command-line
>>>> options specific for
>>>> only one utility.
>>>> This means that these utilities(implementing
>>>> command line interface)
>>>> would significantly
>>>> differ. It makes sense not to put another
>>>> command-line utility
>>>> inside existing dsymutil,
>>>> but make it as a separate utility. That is the
>>>> reason why
>>>> llvm-dwarfutil suggested to be
>>>> implemented not as sub-part of dsymutil but as
>>>> a separate tool.
>>>>
>>>> Please share your preference: whether
>>>> llvm-dwarfutil should be
>>>> separate utility, or a variant of dsymutil
>>>> compiled for ELF?
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Appendix B. The machO object file format is already
>>>> supported by dsymutil.
>>>> Depending on the decision whether
>>>> llvm-dwarfutil would be done as a
>>>> subproject
>>>> of dsymutil or as a separate utility - machO
>>>> would be supported or not.
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Appendix C. Support for the COFF and WASM object
>>>> file formats presented as
>>>> possible future improvement. It would be quite
>>>> easy to add them
>>>> assuming
>>>> that llvm-objcopy already supports these
>>>> formats. It also would require
>>>> supporting DWARF6-suggested tombstone
>>>> values(-1/-2).
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Appendix D. Documentation.
>>>>
>>>> - proposal for DWARF6 which suggested -1/-2
>>>> values for marking bad
>>>> addresses
>>>> http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=200609.1
>>>> - dsymutil tool
>>>> https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/dsymutil.html.
>>>> - proposal "Remove obsolete debug info in lld."
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141468.html
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Appendix E. Possible command line options:
>>>>
>>>> DwarfUtil Options:
>>>>
>>>> --build-aranges - generate
>>>> .debug_aranges table.
>>>> --build-debug-names - generate
>>>> .debug_names table.
>>>> --build-debug-pubnames - generate
>>>> .debug_pubnames table.
>>>> --build-debug-pubtypes - generate
>>>> .debug_pubtypes table.
>>>> --build-gdb-index - generate .gdb_index
>>>> table.
>>>> --compress - Compress debug tables.
>>>> --decompress - Decompress debug tables.
>>>> --deduplicate-types - Do ODR deduplication
>>>> for debug types.
>>>> --garbage-collect - Do garbage
>>>> collecting for debug info.
>>>> --num-threads=<n> - Specify the maximum number
>>>> (n) of
>>>> simultaneous threads
>>>> to use when
>>>> optimizing input file.
>>>> Defaults to the number of cores on the
>>>> current machine.
>>>> --strip-all - Strip all debug tables.
>>>> --strip=<name1,name2> - Strip specified debug
>>>> info tables.
>>>> --strip-unoptimized-debug - Strip all
>>>> unoptimized debug tables.
>>>> --tombstone=<value> - Tombstone value used as a
>>>> marker of
>>>> invalid address.
>>>> =bfd - BFD default value
>>>> =dwarf6 - Dwarf v6.
>>>> --verbose - Enable verbose
>>>> logging and encoding details.
>>>>
>>>> Generic Options:
>>>>
>>>> --help - Display available
>>>> options (--help-hidden
>>>> for more)
>>>> --version - Display the version
>>>> of this program
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200903/331e7b91/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list