[llvm-dev] Phabricator new review email behaviour change?

[James Henderson via llvm-dev]

The issue seems to have been resolved, in that newer patches are indeed
coming from Phabricator again, but there was a period of a few days when it
stopped working. For example, I never received a reviews.llvm.org email for
the creation of the patch D86350, but did for follow-up comments. It did
appear in my llvm-commits folder, sent via the llvm-commits mailing list,
but since I didn't have the version from Phabricator, my
from:reviews at reviews.llvm.org filter didn't spot it, and it got filtered
away.

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 18:33, Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> Seems that `from:reviews at reviews.llvm.org` can still retrieve messages
> related to Phabricator notifications (new differentials by yourself,
> new differentials by others for which you subscribe, and commits
> associated to differentials you subscribe). Do you have more
> information about the anomaly you observed?
>
> For example, from a message I received 4 days ago:
>
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> boundary=3744cde2fafc2e1ab0b2e19da34774d501999ac79b12974f54ed8afbc945
> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 18:33:29 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Fangrui Song via Phabricator <reviews at reviews.llvm.org>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Message-ID: <ycGDVmhWTWa_D3F1wF92qA at ismtpd0007p1iad2.sendgrid.net>
> Thread-Topic: PHID-DREV-hd6ds2iug53idmfbdqxk
>
> I think a rule matching from:reviews at reviews.llvm.org should work.
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:12 AM James Henderson
> <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it me, or has Phabricator changed at some point in the past week or
> two with regards to emails for newly created reviews? I noticed this
> morning that my mailing rule (which previously simply marked new emails
> from review at reviews.llvm.org with a specific tag) was no longer working
> for them, and consequently, I missed several new review requests. (It
> wasn't an issue for subsequent emails for the same review, for the record).
> I _think_ I've come up with a new rule for the current behaviour, but it
> was concerning because I expect I'm not the only one who is in that boat.
> >
> > Flagging it up in case it was an accident and/or so that people know of
> the behaviour change.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > James
>
>
>
> --
> 宋方睿
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200901/d655b2dd/attachment.html>