[llvm-dev] Phabricator request for debuginfo-tests

David Blaikie via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 21 15:37:28 PDT 2020


On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:32 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:23 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:22 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> These are all plugged through global Herald rules in general.
>>> It somehow relies on the monorepo to know how to dispatch (path starting
>>> with LLVM -> llvm-commits@).
>>>
>>> I don't know what the rule should be for debuginfo-tests?
>>>
>>
>> Same as LLVM I think would be good. (that's where the commits mail is
>> going, pretty sure - so it's where the reviews should go)
>>
>
> I mean: I don't know how to detect that a patch is about the debuginfo
> tests: if it is another repo, there won't be a leading path to tell us like
> in the monorepo.
>

Oh, sorry, I see - any idea how mlir, flang, etc, handle this then?


>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mehdi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:02 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mehdi - any idea how this is rigged up/if this could be fixed for the
>>>> debuginfo-tests repo?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:38 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ah, indeed - my mistake!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:34 PM Robinson, Paul <
>>>>> paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m talking about the “subscribed” field in a Phab review, so that
>>>>>> the list sees the posted comments/reviews; you seem to be talking about the
>>>>>> “this was committed” email which does come from github.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --paulr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2020 2:29 PM
>>>>>> *To:* Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>
>>>>>> *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Phabricator request for debuginfo-tests
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will follow-up more on the bug, but I don't think the commits mailing
>>>>>> list mail is powered by phabricator at all - it's some post-commit hook in
>>>>>> the VCS/github itself, I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 6:35 AM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <
>>>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> I filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47934
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47934__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!ql6dBxeOus1GDl0ClfO1BlIfpD2O9XU4NmaiKCCM7MnDTVsiNP5p564p_NB2Q7xesw$>
>>>>>> asking to have
>>>>>> the debuginfo-tests project added to the list of those that subscribe
>>>>>> llvm-commits automatically.  But, it appears that the Phabricator
>>>>>> component doesn't have anyone automatically cc'd, and I suspect that
>>>>>> by failing to put [Phab] in the bug title, whoever knows how to do
>>>>>> this won't notice the bug.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, how does that auto-subscription work?  Note that historically,
>>>>>> I have always come out the worst when tangling with Phabricator...
>>>>>> so I'll do it myself if necessary, if someone can say what "it" is,
>>>>>> but it would be safer for someone else to do the tweaking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> --paulr
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!ql6dBxeOus1GDl0ClfO1BlIfpD2O9XU4NmaiKCCM7MnDTVsiNP5p564p_NBOExc-LQ$>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201021/4474a6a4/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list