[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev]

Thanks, Vitaly.
Somebody is looking at this.


On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:

> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>
>> There is some issue, at least on staging.
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
>> stages but marked as SUCCESS
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Done.
>>>
>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging
>>>> area! Much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production.
>>>> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Galina
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
>>>>> frequently offline.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks everyone!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
>>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you
>>>>>> move all the green bots back there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They do on staging.
>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
>>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
>>>>>>>> annotated commands:
>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK
>>>>>>>> for now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <
>>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It
>>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production
>>>>>>>>> build bot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>>>>>>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new
>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot.
>>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but
>>>>>>>>>>> it will need more love and care.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on
>>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I
>>>>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to
>>>>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to
>>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the
>>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that
>>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements
>>>>>>>>>> of the script.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may
>>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201019/86fa0fb4/attachment.html>