[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev]

They do on staging.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc

Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.



On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:

> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated
> commands:
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for
> now.
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be
>> a functional equivalent of the old one.
>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot.
>>
>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>
>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Galina
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> They are online now -
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>
>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it
>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and
>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use
>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test
>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot
>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can
>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the
>>> script.
>>>
>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need
>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201013/ef8b9dd7/attachment.html>