[llvm-dev] Timeout tests timing out
Arthur Eubanks via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 9 13:48:27 PST 2020
Another case: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43/builds/810
shtest-timeout.py seems to be fairly flaky on the clang-cmake-aarch64-quick
bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43, I get notifications from it
fairly often
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:15 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Looks like there might still be some issues with the timeout tests?
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/126/builds/226/steps/13/logs/FAIL__lit___shtest-timeout_py
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 2:44 PM Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> > > One thing we could do to remove fragility in the test is to remove the
>> > > running of `short.py` in the test. This is only invoked to check that
>> > > it's possible for a command to run to completion in the presence of a
>> > > fixed timeout. If we can live without testing that part (i.e. we only
>> > > test that a timeout can be reached) then the test should be much more
>> > > robust.
>> >
>> > If you're on board with that, it's a tradeoff I think is probably
>> > reasonable from a test coverage V reliability V development time
>> > tradeoff.
>>
>> Sorry for the delay here. I've put a patch up for review that goes
>> with this approach: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88807
>>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201109/a015aad4/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list