[llvm-dev] [llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org: Re: [llvm] 2dea3f1 - [SVE] Add new VectorType subclasses]
Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 13 10:57:08 PDT 2020
Regarding the numerical value of the LLVMTypeKind enum, my understanding is that LLVM-C does not promise to maintain ABI compatability between versions. If I am mistaken, I can fix this issue.
From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of James Y Knight via llvm-dev
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 7:33 AM
To: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at bec.de>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] [llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org: Re: [llvm] 2dea3f1 - [SVE] Add new VectorType subclasses]
Agreed. Those llvm-c changes are wrong, and compatibility needs to be maintained for the numeric values at minimum. Probably also would be a good idea to make LLVMVectorTypeKind a deprecated alias for LLVMFixedVectorTypeKind.
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:11 AM Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Bringing this up on llvm-dev for more general attention.
The problem here is two fold:
(1) Reuse of enumeration values is just a major no-go.
(2) I'm not sure why the existing vector types had to be killed
completely.
But something clearly has to be done here. This majorly affects e.g.
Mesa.
Joerg
----- Forwarded message from Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> -----
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 02:34:12 +0200
From: Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>>
To: Christopher Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com<mailto:ctetreau at quicinc.com>>, Christopher Tetreault <llvmlistbot at llvm.org<mailto:llvmlistbot at llvm.org>>
Cc: llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm] 2dea3f1 - [SVE] Add new VectorType subclasses
Reply-To: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at bec.de<mailto:joerg at bec.de>>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:59:20AM -0700, Christopher Tetreault via llvm-commits wrote:
>
> Author: Christopher Tetreault
> Date: 2020-04-22T08:59:01-07:00
> New Revision: 2dea3f129878e929e5d1f00b91a622eb1ec8be4e
>
> URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2dea3f129878e929e5d1f00b91a622eb1ec8be4e
> DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2dea3f129878e929e5d1f00b91a622eb1ec8be4e.diff
>
> LOG: [SVE] Add new VectorType subclasses
This seems to have basically broken both ABI and API of llvm-c.
Joerg
_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200513/230622ce/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list