[llvm-dev] Function name demangling in llvm ir

[sangeeta chowdhary via llvm-dev]

Any particular reason to avoid demangling?

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:20 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

> (though, usual caveat: you /usually/ shouldn't be doing that - instead
> relying only on whatever semantics the IR actually carries, rather
> than implying extra semantics based on the demangled name)
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:48 PM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > I have not tried it but maybe
> >
> > `std::string llvm::demangle(const std::string &MangledName)`
> >
> > in `llvm/Demangle/Demangle.h`
> >
> > is already what you want.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/24/20 2:10 PM, sangeeta chowdhary via llvm-dev wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am doing some program analysis with C++ programs. I need to check if
> some
> > particular function is called in the program, for that I need the name of
> > the function being called in the call instruction. Since C++ mangles the
> > name of the function, I need a way to demangle the function name in llvm
> > IR. Is there any way to achieve that in llvm pass?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sangeeta
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200624/18d28e6d/attachment.html>