[llvm-dev] [PROPOSAL] Introduce a new LLVM process to resolve contentious decisions

[Kit Barton via llvm-dev]

I like the idea of trying to use this process to determine the adoption
of Discourse. I would suggest that another mailing list could be an
alternative to consider as part of that proposal (specifically to
handle the pitches). 


Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 10:01 AM Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This was a mistake, fixed.
>> >
>> > I missed that this was changed, I was excited about a Discourse category
>> for this! In particular the second point of the doc points at llvm-dev@
>> being a problem as the current forum for such discussions.
>> > If Discourse is a no-go (?), then having a separate mailing-list would
>> seem better to me: if only for archiving/searching/tracking such
>> discussions (but Discourse is much better that the mailing-list archives
>> anyway).
>>
>> Hi Mehdi,
>>
>> I’m personally also in favor of using Discourse in general, but we as a
>> community haven't converged on that decision.  Until a decision is made on
>> that (likely using this process) I think we should stick with llvm-dev as
>> it is the defacto place to have discussions, even given all of the problems
>> it has.
>>
>
> What about have *another* mailing-list dedicated for "pitch"/RFCs/community
> proposals/...?
> (It wouldn't prevent from CC llvm-dev@ when we start a proposal there if
> visibility is an issue, but I expect the newsletter to help as well
>
>
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>