[llvm-dev] RFC: Replacing the default CRT allocator on Windows
David Chisnall via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 2 05:03:53 PDT 2020
On 02/07/2020 05:20, Alexandre Ganea via llvm-dev wrote:
> Time to link clang.exe with LLD and -flto on 36-core:
>
> Windows CRT heap allocator: 38 min 47 sec
>
> mimalloc: 2 min 22 sec
>
> rpmalloc: 2 min 15 sec
>
> snmalloc: 2 min 19 sec
These numbers all seem very close (apart from the baseline). How many
runs did you do and what was the jitter?
FWIW, I'm using snmalloc on FreeBSD instead of jemalloc and clang is
around 2% faster, so it might be worth considering this as an option for
all platforms. It's likely to be a big win on anything where dlmalloc
is the default allocator.
Snmalloc currently supports macOS, Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD,
OpenBSD, Haiku, and OpenEnclave (adding other POSIXy systems is fairly
trivial, can be completely trivial if you don't want any
non-standard-POSIX behaviour) on x86, ARM, and PowerPC (RISC-V and MIPS
under review).
I am obviously biased towards snmalloc, since I'm one of the authors,
and happy to help out anyone wanting to integrate it with LLVM. Note
that snmalloc requires C++17, so would need to be conditional on LLVM
being built with a vaguely modern compiler.
David
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list