[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator -> GitHub PRs?
David Greene via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 23 11:36:25 PST 2020
Fedor Sergeev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> Do we have a good reason to believe that LLVM as a community has
> enough weight to nudge Github to really improve on these two points?
I think we have reason to at least try. They've implemented other stuff
> If yes, then can we start moving there? File bugs or whatnot... It
> would be a very nontrivial effort for me to even describe the problem
> in comprehensible (and non-offensive ;) way, so I know I'm asking
> somebody else to do the hard job.
My guess is someone with greater public visibility/clout than myself
filing bugs and pushing this along would make better progress.
So yeah, I know I'm also asking someone else to do the hard job. But I
am happy to help in any way I can.
I did find these. This is an unofficial issue tracker for github.com.
The official way to communicate is apparently e-mailing
support at github.com, which is not very great. People who send the e-mail
are also posting to this issue tracker so others know what has been sent
and whether there have been any responses from GitHub.
Ability to approve each commit in a PR
Do not auto dismiss PR comments on code change
Mark pull request as depending on another
And maybe official support:
More information about the llvm-dev