[llvm-dev] LLVM build performance with LLVM

Itaru Kitayama via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 3 17:58:08 PST 2020


I have just tried a Release build of LLVM but
with
LIBOMPTARGET_ENABLE_DEBUG enabled. The app build became super fast, but I
can not obtain debugging information that I need at runtime.

On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 5:03 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm still confused by that - whether or not the LLVM you built has debug
> info in it shouldn't at all change what goes into the binaries that LLVM
> produces (modulo a few bugs, but nothing that'd produce drastic performance
> swings). You mention in the bug that it's
> specifically LIBOMPTARGET_ENABLE_DEBUG that is slowing down your
> compilation time? Not the use of a Debug build of LLVM? Have you tried a
> Release build of LLVM but with LIBOMPTARGET_ENABLE_DEBUG enabled?
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 11:58 AM Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> At least, to obtain enough information from libomptarget while running my
>> offloading app on GPU capable environment, I have to build it with an LLVM
>> which was built in Debug mode.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 4:34 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:55 PM Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As I am facing the serious super slow down:
>>>> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44407 , I'd like to
>>>> learn more about how it can be minimized. When debugging an app, there
>>>> are times building it with a
>>>> Debug build LLVM can not be avoided, but a situation like 40 times time
>>>> increase (40 minutes) is hard
>>>> to work with.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not sure I follow - you shouldn't need a debug build of clang to debug
>>> an application built with clang. You'd use a release build of clang to
>>> build your application with debug info (by passing -g).
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 11:14 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 6:09 PM Itaru Kitayama <
>>>>> itaru.kitayama at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> David,
>>>>>> Yes, I was indeed trying to build LLVM with a Debug build. I'll stop
>>>>>> doing that from now on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean, you can - it's just going to be super slow & mostly not what
>>>>> you want, unless you're trying to debug that building process. Usually
>>>>> you'd want to isolate one particular test case, maybe even reduce it,
>>>>> before running it with a debug build of LLVM which will be quite slow
>>>>> (because it's not optimized at all).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am on JSC's JURON machine which has 251 GB of memory on the login
>>>>>> node, that's more than sufficient
>>>>>> to do a build, I suppose, and the linker is LLD as LLVM has a CMake
>>>>>> variable to select the linker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, sounds like you're just tripping over the fact that an
>>>>> unoptimized/debug build of LLVM is very slow. *thumbs up*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 11:02 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Were you trying to use a Debug build to build LLVM? Yes, that would
>>>>>>> be very slow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you mean you were using a release build of LLVM to build a Debug
>>>>>>> build of LLVM - yeah, that's generally going to be recommended. Did this
>>>>>>> get slower/change significantly in performance? Many people have trouble
>>>>>>> with building Debug builds (no matter the host compiler) especially if
>>>>>>> they're using bfd-ld, since it's quite slow/uses a lot of memory. There are
>>>>>>> a few other issues to do with memory usage (do you have less than about a
>>>>>>> GB of RAM per CPU? Then you'll probably hit swapping by default & have a
>>>>>>> bad time - there are ways around that)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 5:42 PM Itaru Kitayama via llvm-dev <
>>>>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> When building LLVM, is it always recommended to do it with the
>>>>>>>> latest official release, currently, it is 9.0.1? I ask because when
>>>>>>>> I tried
>>>>>>>> it with a Debug build, it took an enormous amount of time on
>>>>>>>> POWER8.
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200104/3650c68d/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list