[llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental

[Chris Lattner via llvm-dev]

What do you see as the pros and cons of making it a stable target?  Does anyone else have any concerns about doing so?

-Chris

> On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> +better dylanmckay address
> 
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There was a thread a few days ago about the expectations for experimental targets. At the moment, the only experimental target is AVR. It's been in the tree for a long time now, and generally seems well-behaved.
> 
> Should we just make it a normal target?
> 
> Nico
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200214/721c83dd/attachment.html>