[llvm-dev] [10.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here
Rainer Orth via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 6 07:08:10 PST 2020
Hi Hans,
> It took a bit longer than planned due to master being a somewhat
> unstable at the branch point, but Release Candidate 1 has now been
> tagged as llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1.
>
> Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/10.0.0/#rc1
>
> Pre-built binaries will be added there as they become available.
I've already uploaded Solaris 11.4/AMD64 and Solaris 11.4/SPARCv9
binaries to releases-origin.llvm.org some time ago.
While amd64-pc-solaris2.11 results are en par with the LLVM 9.0.0 ones
(some failures fixed or xfailed since then)
Expected Passes : 54488
Expected Failures : 180
Unsupported Tests : 2409
Unexpected Failures: 23
the sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 ones are horrible compared to the 9.0.0 ones:
* 9.0.0 final:
Expected Passes : 48477
Expected Failures : 180
Unsupported Tests : 1443
Unexpected Passes : 1
Unexpected Failures: 382
* 10.0.0 rc1:
Expected Passes : 47959
Expected Failures : 186
Unsupported Tests : 1615
Unexpected Passes : 1
Unexpected Failures: 4278
A large number of those only occur for non-SPARC targets (something I
usually don't test at all), and even the buildbot is way way better with
only 51 unexpected failures. However, that one only does a 1-stage
build where errors due to Bug 42535 don't occur. Still, comparing
master results on Solaris 11.5/SPARC for all targets between a 1-stage
build with gcc 9.1.0 and a 2-stage build shows a similar pattern:
* 1-stage:
Expected Passes : 53734
Expected Failures : 205
Unsupported Tests : 2495
Unexpected Passes : 1
Unexpected Failures: 228
* 2-stage:
Expected Passes : 45756
Expected Failures : 205
Unsupported Tests : 2495
Unexpected Passes : 2
Unexpected Failures: 7303
I fear this is effectively impossible to analyze let alone fix for the
10.0.0 release.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list