[llvm-dev] Questions about jump threading optimization and what we can do
Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sun Feb 2 00:53:44 PST 2020
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:47 AM Karl Rehm via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Since the bug report here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44679 I've been thinking about cases like it, such as: https://godbolt.org/z/Fwq8mn
>
> I wonder what we can do about this in a general sense. As far as I can tell, the jump threading algorithm is *really* conservative, which is one reason this isn't working as well as I'd hope; however, we don't want to produce irreducible control flow that the other passes would work less effectively on. Thoughts?
Just brainstorming, really, but what about running a less conservative
version of JumpThreading later, _after_ loop passes have run?
Cheers,
Nicolai
>
> - Karl
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list