[llvm-dev] [RFC] Expanding the scope of ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_NEW_PASS_MANAGER

[Arthur Eubanks via llvm-dev]

>
> I added a comment on D92433. In lld/ELF, we generally don't recommend
> configure-time default values. We expect the compiler driver to handle
> platform differences
> We expect the driver to handle platform differences (e.g. default -pie)
> and pass
> the proper options to LLD. We can default to true and let the clang driver
> pass
> --no-lto-new-pass-manager to LLD if needed.
>
That sounds fine to me as long as people don't use lld/ELF directly.
Although it can't hurt to also change the default value,can it? :)

For COFF/wasm does changing the default in the lld driver make sense?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201202/37644f81/attachment.html>