[llvm-dev] MLIR Buildbot configuration

[Christian Kühnel via llvm-dev]

Hi Galina,

How can I set a builder to "batch mode"? I could not find any documentation
or examples for that...

Best,
Christian


On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:33 AM Christian Kühnel <kuhnel at google.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> happy to set it to batch mode, if someone tells me where to configure it :)
>
> Otherwise we could also upgrade the machine from 16 to 32 cores, if you
> would like to get more build results. Or do both...
>
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 1:05 AM Stephen Neuendorffer via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 for batching.  In practice it's probably more important that things
>> get run for every MLIR checkin, and not necessarily for every LLVM checkin.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:26 AM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed there is quite a backlog here right now:
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/mlir-windows and here
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/mlir-nvidia
>>> I agree that 17 hours of latency is likely too high to justify the
>>> non-batching.
>>>
>>> Note that the bots are doing `ninja` first followed by `ninja
>>> check-mlir`: they likely build much more than they need: the build could be
>>> faster by avoiding the first step.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mehdi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:05 AM Johannes Doerfert <
>>> johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I broke the MLIR build yesterday and the two Flang bots told me about
>>>> it
>>>> pretty much right away. Yay!
>>>> That is how I always thought the setup should work (modulo that we all
>>>> try not to break builds).
>>>> Today I got emails from an MLIR bot and I was a bit confused. I looked
>>>> at the configuration of the two
>>>> MLIR bots and it seems they test commits one by one, with the backlog
>>>> that you would expect.
>>>> I was wondering if my observation is correct and if this is the desired
>>>> behavior?
>>>> I don't necessarily think such a setup is bad but both MLIR bots run it
>>>> this way, which might catch
>>>> more problems but with a longer delay, unsure if it is worth it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I figured I bring this up but I'm fine when people don't see the need
>>>> for change (or more bots).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~ Johannes
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200825/ee97c5a4/attachment.html>