[llvm-dev] mini RFC: adding a tag for the SVN -> github migration
Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 25 13:39:22 PDT 2019
As an end to that debate, I added a "llvmorg-10-init" tag just now,
see http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/136188.html
Richard, does that address your use case?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:59 PM James Y Knight via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I really don't like that....I'd much prefer to resurrect the previous discussion about tagging master after each release branch-point. Which I think was generally agreed upon, except for a debate about what to CALL those tags.
>
> E.g., if we called `git merge-base origin/release/9.x origin/master` "10_dev", then
>
> $ git describe
> 10_dev-8276-g9671d1dc1764
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:00 PM Richard Smith via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Proposal:
>>
>> $ git tag -a r375505 186155b89c2d2a2f62337081e3ca15f676c9434b -m "Last SVN commit before switchover to github."
>> $ git push origin r375505
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> This makes "git describe" produce usable linear revision numbers that are a natural continuation of the SVN revision numbering. For example, a git describe on HEAD from earlier today gives:
>>
>> $ git describe
>> r375505-115-g9b8dd004034
>>
>> (That is: r375505 plus 115 git commits = 9b8dd004034)
>>
>> This isn't intended to be an official revision number, nor a long-term solution to the numbering problem, but seems useful in the short term.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list