[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub Migration Schedule and Plans

[Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev]

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:59 AM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 10/09/2019 11:05 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     We're less than 2 weeks away from the developer meeting, so I wanted
> to
> >     give an update on the GitHub migration and what's (hopefully) going
> to
> >     happen during the developer meeting.
> >
> >     Everyone who has added their information to the github-usernames.txt
> >     file in SVN before today should have received an invite to become a
> collaborator
> >     on the llvm-project repository.  If you did not receive an invite
> and think
> >     you should have, please contact me off-list.  I will continue to
> monitor the
> >     file for new updates and periodically send out new batches of
> invites.
> >
> >     There is still some ongoing work to get the buildbots ready and the
> mailing lists
> >     ready, but we are optimistic that the work will be done in time.
> >
> >     The team at GitHub has finished implementing the "Require Linear
> History"
> >     branch protection that we requested.  The feature is in beta and
> currently
> >     enabled in the llvm-project repository.  This means that we will
> have the
> >     option to commit directly via git, in addition to using the git-llvm
> script.
> >     A patch that updates git-llvm to push to git instead of svn can be
> found here:
> >     https://reviews.llvm.org/D67772.  You should be able to test it out
> on your
> >     own fork of the llvm-project repository.
> >
> >     The current plan is to begin the final migration steps on the
> evening (PDT)
> >     of October 21.  Here is what will happen:
> >
> >     1. Make SVN read-only.
> >     2. Turn-off the SVN->git update process.
> >     3. Commit the new git-llvm script directly to github.
> >     4. Grant all contributors write access to the repository.
> >
> >
> > Is the repo configured to forbid contributors to create new branches?
> I'm worried about the "jungle" it can become quickly if we leave open the
> possibility to create branches "at will" in the repo, I rather leave this
> to maintainers.
> >
>
> I haven't been able to find a way to restrict branch creation for
> committers,
> I'm not sure if this is even possible.
>
>
I think you can just go to the branch settings, add a new branch protection
rule, match on everything but master, and check "Restrict who can push to
matching branches".



> We could try to enforce this rule in the git-llvm script, but this would
> mean making use of the script mandatory, which was our original plan, but
> that was based on the assumption that the "Require Linear History"
> protection would not be ready in time.
>
> Generally, would it be better if we kept use of the script mandatory so
> that
> we can handle this and other potential restrictions in the future?
>
> - Tom
> >
> >
> >     5. Email lists announcing that the migration is complete.
> >
> >     Once the migration is complete, if you run into any issues, please
> file
> >     a bug, and mark it as a blocker for the github metabug PR39393.
> >
> >     If you have any questions or think I am missing something, please
> >     let me know.
> >
> >
> > This is fantastic! Thank you so much for doing this work Tom :)
> >
> > --
> > Mehdi
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191010/2bcc40dd/attachment.html>