[llvm-dev] DebugInfo work contribution and update.

Wed Oct 9 12:13:11 PDT 2019

Thanks for correcting this Paul.

Yes, Typo indeed.
it's PR43622  and PR43623.

I'll keep a note of your advice.

Thanks!
--Sourabh Singh Tomar

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:29 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>
wrote:

> Welcome Sourabh,
>
>
>
> There are many bits of DWARF-5 that haven’t been implemented.  I know
> there is currently no big push within Sony to “fill in the corners” for v5,
> as we have been more focused on quality of debug info for optimized code
> (not losing information or reporting incorrect information) and the Dexter
> tool.  There is no shortage of ways in which debug info for optimized code
> could be better; in general we are trying to post bug reports for anything
> we find that we’re not working on right away.
>
>
>
> I think you are doing the right thing as far as coordinating with other
> people: Watch the llvm-commits and cfe-commits lists to notice when people
> are posting patches; post your own patches; and ask on the dev lists.  If
> you decide to work on something that was reported as a bug, post a note
> there or assign the bug to yourself.
>
>
>
> I looked up the two PRs you cited; PR43622 is likely a simple oversight
> that should be easy to fix.  PR43263 doesn’t appear to be related to debug
> info, was that a typo?
>
> --paulr
>
>
>
> *From:* Sourabh Singh Tomar <sourav0311 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 09, 2019 2:38 PM
> *To:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>; Robinson, Paul <
> paul.robinson at sony.com>; Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>; Jonas
> Devlieghere <jdevlieghere at apple.com>; Ali Tamur <tamur at google.com>; Pavel
> Labath <pavel at labath.sk>; Pavel Labath <labath at google.com>;
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Clang Dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>; George, Jini
> Susan <jinisusan.george at amd.com>; sourabhsingh.tomar at amd.com
> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] DebugInfo work contribution and update.
>
>
>
> Thanks, David for updating us.
>
>
>
> Regarding, mail address, can use anyone{@gmail or @amd}. but
> sourav0311 at gmail.com works best for me for mailing lists related stuff.
>
>
>
> Regarding, GDB side of DWARFv5 side of things, we've testing GDB-8.3 WRT
> DWARFv5 clang and gcc binaries to get better idea of debuggability of clang
> generated binaries with GDB.
>
> Primary motivation being GDB better handling of gcc generated binaries,
> compared to clang.
>
>
>
> We've been also tracking Ali's patches in gdb mailing list. Jini can
> update you better on, this one. Will ask her share update on this one.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sourabh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:59 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +some other debugger people (Pavel - wasn't sure which email address you
> prefer, feel free to let me know (privately or publicly) for future
> reference)
>
> I work at Google & we're certainly interested in DWARFv5 compliance - I'm
> currently working on improving debug_loclist emission to share more address
> pool entries ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D68620 ) which includes some
> improvements to llvm-dwarfdump to go with that. (Pavel's working on further
> improvements https://reviews.llvm.org/D68271 )
>
> I haven't looked at/started on the loclist issue (PR43622) - so if you
> want to look at that, that's fine by me.
>
> Are you also interested in the debugger side of things? GDB's DWARFv5
> support is pretty incomplete & Ali's already looking at some of that, and I
> might get to the debug_loclist improvements necessary - but if someone else
> wants to do that before me, I won't complain.
>
> Not sure of any other major holes in LLVM's DWARFv5 support, but they
> might be out there, for sure.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:37 AM Sourabh Singh Tomar via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi llvm-dev, cfe-dev,
>
>
>
> It's been a while since our team is investigating DebugInfo in LLVM, we're
> looking forward to contribute and enhance in LLVM DebugInfo.
>
>
>
> We,'ve been investigating mostly on DWARF-5 aspects -- couple of them to
> mention--
>
> 1. Language aspects
>
> 2. Location mostly optimized out ones
>
> 3. DebugInfo conformance to DWARF-5
>
>
>
> To avoid getting conflicted with some body else's work and avoiding
> redundancy. We would like to know the over-all state of current community
> developments happening WRT DWARF-5.
>
>
>
> As of now, we're working on --
>
> PR 43263, 43622 -- reported today {Just Now}
>
>
>
> we'll be up-streaming patches for these.
>
>
>
> Please let us know your thoughts, and anything else that's relevant that
> we need to aware of before picking up.
>
>
>
> Thanks in anticipation!
>
> Sourabh Singh Tomar
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191010/32d8a064/attachment.html>