[llvm-dev] Instcombine and bitcast of vector. Wrong CHECKs in cast.ll, miscompile in instcombine?
Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 28 06:12:15 PST 2019
Hi,
In
llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/cast.ll
there is a test like this:
target datalayout = "E-p:64:64:64-p1:32:32:32-p2:64:64:64-p3:64:64:64-
a0:0:8-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-
v64:64:64-v128:128:128-n8:16:32:64"
[...]
define <3 x i32> @test60(<4 x i32> %call4) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test60(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[P10:%.*]] = shufflevector <4 x i32> [[CALL4:%.*]],
<4 x i32> undef, <3 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2>
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <3 x i32> [[P10]]
;
%p11 = bitcast <4 x i32> %call4 to i128
%p9 = trunc i128 %p11 to i96
%p10 = bitcast i96 %p9 to <3 x i32>
ret <3 x i32> %p10
}
If we assume the input vector is e.g. <1, 2, 3, 4> then I assume %p11
would be the (hex) value 1234, %p9 would be the 234 and %p10 would then
be the vector <2, 3, 4>.
Am I right, or am I missing something here? Note that the datalayout
says we're using big endian.
But the CHECK-NEXT checks that the result is made up of the elements at
index 0, 1 and 2 from the input vector, which would be <1, 2, 3>.
So, broken testcase or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Mikael
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list