[llvm-dev] Are C++17 host applications supported?
James Y Knight via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 26 12:41:22 PST 2019
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:52 PM Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> It looks like this was added here:
> IIRC Abseil has a similar problem, and they chose not to support the use
> case of ABI compat between TUs with different standard versions.
Abseil changed their mind, and do currently intend to *try* to support this
usage, by making the options which do things like switch class
implementations be configure-time selected, rather than autodetected. (See
the beginnings of this in
It turns out users really do want to be able to do this. And it's
especially important if you're depending on a distro-provided libabseil.so
-- which they want to support. Having application code be unable to
opt-into a newer C++ version than the default version used by the distro is
not a great situation.
Personally, IMO LLVM should support this use case. I think it was a mistake
> to add inline functions to Compiler.h, which is supposed to be all about
> feature detection and macro definitions.
This sort of thing is hard to make a guarantee about it. But I would argue
that LLVM could try to support it similarly to how we try to support mixing
NDEBUG and !NDEBUG.
> Alternatively if people want to keep things the way they are, we should
> change LLVM's CMake to build with C++17 if it is supported. If the user can
> link against LLVM and enable C++17, then the standard library shared by the
> user and LLVM *must* have an aligned allocation function.
That option wouldn't work either, if the function remains in the header.
It'll just break user code built with standards earlier than C++17, rather
than breaking user code built with C++17. (Neither allocating with
aligned-new and freeing with unaligned-delete, nor allocating with
unaligned-new and freeing with aligned-delete is acceptable).
> Either way, I don't think the user should have to do anything.
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 3:04 AM Machiel van Hooren via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> I am using the llvm libraries compiled with the C++14 standard with a
>> host application that is compiled with the C++17 standard (Both on
>> Windows/MSVC). I am running into an incompatibility for which I filed a
>> bug report: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44131
>> However, I was wondering if C++17 host applications are even supported?
>> Machiel van Hooren
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev