[llvm-dev] Difference between clang -O1 -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone and clang -O0 -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone in LLVM 9
David Blaikie via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 13 10:00:35 PST 2019
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:58 AM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Without actually trying it myself, I would say that the -O1 command line
> runs optimization passes where the -O0 command line does not. Thus, your
> “baseline” IR is already somewhat optimized in the -O1 case. If you want
> to see IR with no optimizations run at all, you want to add `-Xclang
> -disable-llvm-passes` to your command line for producing unoptimized IR. I
> think this would produce the same results for -O0 and -O1.
Except then you'll get optnone on functions at -O0 (this is so that the -O0
in one compilation is respected in LTO situations where it may be merged
with another optimizing compilation)
While I don't think we have any guarantee that "clang <flags> -Xclang
-disable-llvm-passes x.cpp -emit-llvm -o x.bc && clang <flags> x.bc" (&
certainly not if the second step is opt, not clang) - it's certainly true
if you don't pass the same flags to both the first and second, you may get
different output (-O flags being the flagship here - it's not just the
optnone thing, but lifetime markers and other things in Clang's IRGen that
differ depending on optimization level).
> *From:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> *On Behalf Of *hameeza
> ahmed via llvm-dev
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 13, 2019 4:02 AM
> *To:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> *Subject:* [llvm-dev] Difference between clang -O1 -Xclang
> -disable-O0-optnone and clang -O0 -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone in LLVM 9
> I m trying to test individual O3 optimizations/ replicating O3 behavior on
> IR. I took unoptimized IR (O0), used disable-o0-optnone via (*clang -O0
> -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone*). I read somewhere about *clang -O1
> -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone,* so I also tested on this initial IR.
> I have observed by using individual optimizations, the performance (i.e
> time) is better when the base/initial IR is generated via *clang -O1
> -Xclang -disable-O0-optnone*. In case of *clang -O0 -Xclang
> -disable-O0-optnone* initial IR, the performance is reduced.
> What is the possible reason for this?
> What is the right way?
> Please guide.
> Thank You
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev