[llvm-dev] Interpreter improvement

[mayuyu.io via llvm-dev]

Well for my designed use case I plan to use it to interpret IR in production environment. As such I remember there were quite some issues with it, on top of my head is support for var_arg native function calling

Zhang

> 在 2019年3月4日，08:21，Alberto Barbaro <barbaro.alberto at gmail.com> 写道：
> 
> Hi,
> I my case I needed to trace the execution of a specific .ll file. I wanted to know when a store and load instruction were executed. Maybe extending the Interpreter class was not the best option so I'm happy to hear suggestions.
> 
> As a curiosity, why do you think that class should be rewritten?
> 
> Thanks
> 
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 08:15 mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote:
>> I dont quite understand the meaning of making almost all the visit methods, care to explain?
>> 
>> On a side note, last time I checked that part I think it probably needs a full rewrite from ground up IMHO
>> 
>> Zhang
>> 
>> > 在 2019年3月4日，08:06，Alberto Barbaro via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> 写道：
>> > 
>> > Hi,
>> > I going through the Interpreter class source code and I think making almost all the visit methods (maybe not visitInstruction yet) would really help anybody that wants to create any sort of tracer or similar. Would be a patch in this case worthy?
>> > 
>> > Thanks
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > LLVM Developers mailing list
>> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190304/515913a5/attachment.html>