[llvm-dev] ADT/SmallSet missing operator ==?

[Chris Lattner via llvm-dev]

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 10:15 AM, De Azevedo Piovezan, Felipe via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
>  
> Contrary to std::set, SmallSet does not define an operator ==. While it’s not difficult to implement it, I was hoping it would be possible to use it as a drop-in replacement for std::set (modulo the fact that SmallSet does not guarantee sorted iteration order).
> Is there a special reason for this or is it just a matter that nobody was ever interested in it?
>  

I think that no one ever got around to implementing it.  Patches welcome! :-)

-Chris


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190302/1156fffe/attachment.html>