[llvm-dev] orc vs mcjit
Ashok Anand via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 30 02:38:51 PDT 2019
yeah i m concerned about jit compilation time..
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:57 PM Praveen Velliengiri <
praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes I think so.. Could you please tell me in which context (compile time
> improvement)? That is whether you are interested in knowing whether having
> ORC instead of MCJIT, will increase your LLVM Build time or you are
> concerned about the JIT Compilation time?
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 12:48, Ashok Anand <ashok.anand at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Praveen. Is it suitable for LLVM 7.0.1 ? Apart from flexibility,
>> do we see any compile time improvements as well with ORC?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:31 PM Praveen Velliengiri <
>> praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> MCJIT hopefully will be removed in subsequent releases. I think the last
>>> release version is more suitable.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 11:45, Ashok Anand via llvm-dev <
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which llvm version is more suitable to switch to orc - vs - mcjit. We
>>>> don't have requirement of lazy compilation, in that case, is it worth
>>>> switching?
>>>> We do have requirement of ability to serialize machine code and reuse
>>>> it later. MCJit seems to provide that option - how well is that supported
>>>> in ORC ?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190630/b55b893c/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list