[llvm-dev] Using isConfused() method for LLVM Dependence Analysis
David Green via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jun 15 01:30:50 PDT 2019
Hello.
Are a, b and c globals in this example? How are you running this?
I believe depends() will return a pointer to a Dependence (technically a unique pointer to a Dependence), which should be nullptr if there are no dependencies, such as these cases that should be no-alias.
Confused dependencies are expected to come from cases where we don't know the relationship between pointers. Such as this where we don't know the relationship between a and b:
void test(int * a, int * b, int n)
{
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
a[i] = 1;
b[i] = 2;
}
}
Dave
From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Bodhisatwa via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Sent: 14 June 2019 17:50
To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: [llvm-dev] Using isConfused() method for LLVM Dependence Analysis
Hi,
I am trying to find out instances of confused dependencies in my
program. According to LLVM's doxygen page, 'confused dependencies' are
detected by function isConfused() - Returns true if this dependence is
confused (the compiler understands nothing and makes worst-case
assumptions)
(http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Dependence.html#a5c65e22ef4b0368ab040d1bd4ead382d)
For the following code snippet:
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
a = 1;
for (int j = 0; j < 9; j++)
{
b = 2;
for (int k = 0; k < 8; k++)
{
c = 3;
}
}
}
We are constructing dependencies between the corresponding IR of the
above code and checking whether it is confused or not:
store i32 1, i32* @a, align 4
store i32 2, i32* @b, align 4
Confused Dependence or Not: 1
Since the variables 'a' and 'b' are in different memory locations, why
is LLVM's isConfused method gives us True?
--
Bodhisatwa
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list