[llvm-dev] Strange behaviour of post-legalising optimisations(?)

[Tim Northover via llvm-dev]

Hi,

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 07:28, Joan Lluch <joan.lluch at icloud.com> wrote:
> So any additional help would be appreciated.

I'm not terribly familiar with the code involved, but I did notice x86
(which doesn't have post-increment addressing either) managed to avoid
the form you don't want. So perhaps seeing where it diverges from your
path would be a good starting point.

Cheers.

Tim.