[llvm-dev] Why do we avoid pure virtual functions in compiler-rt?
Julian Lettner via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 24 15:32:20 PDT 2019
Hi all,
I am just working on some code and noticed that we refrain from declaring any pure virtual functions in compiler-rt.
Our conceptually abstract classes are therefore not considered “abstract” in the C++ sense.
This turns some compile-time errors into run-time errors. Is there a reason we do this?
Example code:
class SymbolizerProcess {
[...]
virtual bool ReachedEndOfOutput(const char *buffer, uptr length) const {
UNIMPLEMENTED();
}
[...]
}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190724/470da1ca/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list