[llvm-dev] lld write wrong symbol value in .data section if enable -pie
Shi, Steven via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 28 21:37:49 PST 2019
Hi Peter,
Good news. The --apply-dynamic-relocs works for me. I finally enable the clang + ld.lld for Uefi firmware build. Thank you very much!
Also many thanks to Rui.
My next target will be the lld-link enabling. Will let you two know my progress.
Thanks
Steven Shi
Intel\SSG\FID\Firmware Infrastructure
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Shi, Steven via llvm-dev
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:59 AM
To: Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org>
Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] lld write wrong symbol value in .data section if enable -pie
Hi Peter,
Thanks, I will try your suggestion and let you know my result.
Thanks
Steven
From: Peter Smith [mailto:peter.smith at linaro.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 1:55 AM
To: Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com<mailto:steven.shi at intel.com>>
Cc: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com<mailto:ruiu at google.com>>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] lld write wrong symbol value in .data section if enable -pie
Hello Steven,
One difference between ld.lld and ld.bfd is that ld.lld defaults to --no-apply-dynamic-relocs (do not write the relocation addend) and ld.bfd defaults to --apply-dynamic-relocs (write the relocation addend). Can you try again with --apply-dynamic-relocs ?
Note that for RELA relocations a dynamic loader is supposed to resolve the relocation using the Addend in the relocation, ignoring the value in the place (.data section in your case). When linking -pie it is generally assumed that you will have a dynamic loader to resolve any relocations resulting from it so I don't think LLD is incorrect to put 0 in the .data section in this case.
There are a couple of things I don't understand about the output though:
- If the symbol we are relocating against has hidden visibility I'd expect a R_X86_64_RELATIVE relocation without a symbol for a -pie link.
- I thought R_X86_64_64 wasn't a dynamic relocation? I'm not that familiar with X86 so I could be missing something glaringly obvious here.
If --apply-dynamic-relocs doesn't work, would you consider making a small example and perhaps raise a PR? If it turns out not to be a problem we can always close it.
Peter
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 15:35, Shi, Steven via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Hi Rui,
I still fail to enable the lld in my Uefi firmware build to replace ld, and I found it is related to the wrong symbol values in the .data section, which are pointed by R_X86_64_64 relocation entries. I need your advices.
My firmware uses a linker script https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBase.lds to do the linking. We use position independent code with hidden visibility to inform the compiler that symbol references are never resolved at runtime. My problem is I found after the lld linking with –pie enabled, the symbol values in .data section, which have the R_X86_64_64 relocation entries, are all 0. In other word, I found the S in below R_X86_64_64 calculation is 0.
Name: R_X86_64_64
1
word64
S + A
Below is an example to compare the lld and ld, sorry about the verbose.
1. Firstly, I use lld to link a HelloWorld module with -pie enabled:
"/home/jshi19/llvm/releaseinstall/bin/ld.lld" -pie -z relro --hash-style=gnu --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_x86_64 -dynamic-linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -o /home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_CLANG38/X64/MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld/DEBUG/HelloWorld.dll -u _ModuleEntryPoint -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.3.0 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu -L/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../.. -L/home/jshi19/llvm/releaseinstall/bin/../lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib -q --gc-sections -z max-page-size=0x40 --entry _ModuleEntryPoint -Map /home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_CLANG38/X64/MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld/DEBUG/HelloWorld.map --whole-archive -O0 -melf_x86_64 --oformat elf64-x86-64 --start-group @/home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_CLANG38/X64/MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld/OUTPUT/static_library_files.lst --end-group --defsym=PECOFF_HEADER_SIZE=0x228 --script=/home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBase.lds
2. Then, I check the R_X86_64_64 relocation entries in .rela.data section, and find their target offsets
$ readelf -r /home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_CLANG38/X64/MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld/DEBUG/HelloWorld.dll
Relocation section '.rela.data' at offset 0x5b7e8 contains 41 entries:
Offset Info Type Sym. Value Sym. Name + Addend
… …
000000005040 00d600000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000003130 TestFunction1 + 0
000000005048 00d700000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000003150 TestFunction2 + 0
3. Next, I check the symbol values in .data section which are targeted by above R_X86_64_64 relocatons
$ readelf -x2 HelloWorld.dll
Hex dump of section '.data':
NOTE: This section has relocations against it, but these have NOT been applied to this dump.
… …
0x00005030 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
0x00005040 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
0x00005050 4ebe7903 06d77d43 b037edb8 2fb772a4 N.y...}C.7../.r.
0x00005060 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
… …
You can see the offset 0x5040 and 0x5048 symbol value are all 0, which is not correct.
But if I remove the -pie option in the above step 1 lld link command, the 0x5040 and 0x5048 symbol values are correct.
$ readelf -x2 HelloWorld.dll
Hex dump of section '.data':
NOTE: This section has relocations against it, but these have NOT been applied to this dump.
… …
0x00005030 04420000 00000000 00000000 00000000 .B..............
0x00005040 30310000 00000000 50310000 00000000 01......P1......
0x00005050 4ebe7903 06d77d43 b037edb8 2fb772a4 N.y...}C.7../.r.
0x00005060 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
… …
And if I replace lld with ld but still use exact same link options with –pie enabled, the R_X86_64_64 symbol values are correct.
1. Link again with ld and same link options:
ld -pie -z relro --hash-style=gnu --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_x86_64 -dynamic-linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -o /home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_CLANG38/X64/MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld/DEBUG/HelloWorld.dll -u _ModuleEntryPoint -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.3.0 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu -L/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../.. -L/home/jshi19/llvm/releaseinstall/bin/../lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib -q --gc-sections -z max-page-size=0x40 --entry _ModuleEntryPoint -Map /home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_CLANG38/X64/MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld/DEBUG/HelloWorld.map --whole-archive -O0 -melf_x86_64 --oformat elf64-x86-64 --start-group @/home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/NOOPT_CLANG38/X64/MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld/OUTPUT/static_library_files.lst --end-group --defsym=PECOFF_HEADER_SIZE=0x228 --script=/home/jshi19/wksp_efi/lgao4/edk2/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBase.lds
2. Then, check the .rela.data section R_X86_64_64 relocation entries:
… …
000000004f40 00a400000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000003130 TestFunction1 + 0
000000004f48 009a00000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000003150 TestFunction2 + 0
… …
3. Check the R_X86_64_64 targeting symbol values in .data section
… …
0x00004f30 f3410000 00000000 00000000 00000000 .A..............
0x00004f40 30310000 00000000 50310000 00000000 01......P1......
0x00004f50 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
… …
You can see the offset 0x4f40 and 0x4f48 symbol value are not 0, which is correct.
Appreciate if you could give me some advices on how to let lld output correct symbol values when enable pie.
Thanks
Steven
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190129/e442875b/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list