[llvm-dev] ADT/SmallSet missing operator ==?

De Azevedo Piovezan, Felipe via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 28 10:15:49 PST 2019


Contrary to std::set, SmallSet does not define an operator ==. While it's not difficult to implement it, I was hoping it would be possible to use it as a drop-in replacement for std::set (modulo the fact that SmallSet does not guarantee sorted iteration order).
Is there a special reason for this or is it just a matter that nobody was ever interested in it?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190228/e704edfd/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list