[llvm-dev] [RFC][ORC] Revisiting Bug 23991

[David Blaikie via llvm-dev]

Discussion's probably fine to take place on the review - but I think Lang's
out of the office at the moment, possibly until the new year some time, so
responses might be a bit delayed for review/design discussion/etc.

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 6:13 PM Min-Yih Hsu via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start another discussion on bug 23991 (
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23991), regarding the missing
> reregistration of EH frames in ORCv2.
>
> Compared to the time where the bugzilla thread was created, I think the
> structure of ORCv2 is fairly stable now. So I try to create a small patch
> trying to fix that: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71683
>
> My concern is that whether this is the proper place to put the
> deregistration logic. And whether we should put a note to remind future
> MemoryManager implementations to take care of the deregistration since it’s
> not suitable to put deregistration in MemoryManager’s dtor as explained
> in the code review description.
>
> B.R.
> Min-Yih
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191218/15382075/attachment.html>