[llvm-dev] [FPEnv] Do we need constrained/strict versions of these intrinsics?

Craig Topper via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 9 14:26:46 PST 2019

I was thinking about a few less common floating point things and wondered
if we need constrained/strict versions of them.

-int_fmuladd - which is used by clang to support fp-contract=on where only
operations within a statement sare allowed to be concentrated.

-int_convert_to_fp16/int_convert_from_fp16 - Used by some targets to
support ieee 16-bit floats as a storage only type I think. A FIXME in clang
indicates the plan was to get rid of these all together, but I'm not sure
where we are on that.

-Not an intrinsic, but we also have ISD::FP16_TO_FP and ISD::FP_TO_FP16 in
SelectionDAG. I believe these are created during type legalization if half
needs to be promoted.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191209/23f90d7a/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list