[llvm-dev] [RFC] High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update

[Renato Golin via llvm-dev]

On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 15:35, Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> The best practice I've seen, and one that I'll suggest we document, is that if a new patch does not address all outstanding feedback, the author should explicitly state that in the patch description.

+1!

For example: to be addressed by a following patch, or assumption no
longer valid, etc.