[llvm-dev] ORC v2 question

[Dibyendu Majumdar via llvm-dev]

Hi Lang,

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 22:03, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
> When you say your code is not getting optimized, do you mean that IR optimizations are not being applied, or that codegen optimizations are not being applied?
>
> What do you see if you dump the modules before/after running the pass manager on them, like this:
>
> dbgs() << "Before optimization:\n" << *M << "\n";
> for (auto &F : *M)
>   FPM->run(F);
> dbgs() << "Before optimization:\n" << *M << "\n";
>
> I expect that output to be the same for both ORC and ORCv2. If not something is going wrong with IR optimization.

Well for ORCV2 there is no change before and after.
I also get this message:

JIT session error: Symbols not found: { raise_error }

Yes raise_error and all other extern functions are explicitly added as
global symbols.

>
> CodeGen optimization seems a more likely culprit: JITTargetMachineBuilder and ExecutionEngineBuilder have different defaults for their CodeGen opt-level. JITTargetMachineBuilder defaults to CodeGenOpt::None, and ExecutionEngineBuilder default to CodeGenOpt::Default.
>
> What happens if you make the following modification to your setup?
>
> auto JTMB = llvm::orc::JITTargetMachineBuilder::detectHost();
> JTMB->setCodeGenOptLevel(CodeGenOpt::Default); // <-- Explicitly set Codegen opt level
> auto dataLayout = JTMB->getDefaultDataLayoutForTarget();
>

No change.

Regards