[llvm-dev] Suboptimal code generated by clang+llc in quite a common scenario (?)

[Tim Northover via llvm-dev]

On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 17:08, Alex Brachet-Mialot via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> This might not be the workaround you want because it is only available in C, but you can use restrict to allow such optimizations.

It also doesn't work in Clang unfortunately. We can only represent
restrict on function arguments at the moment.

Cheers.

Tim.