[llvm-dev] how to submit inter-dependent llvm and clang patches
via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 2 07:30:36 PDT 2019
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Y
> Song via llvm-dev
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2019 1:57 AM
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
> Subject: [llvm-dev] how to submit inter-dependent llvm and clang patches
>
> Hi,
>
> I have two BPF related patches,
> clang: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65615
> llvm: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65617
>
> The llvm patch changes one IR Builder function signature:
> from:
> Value *CreatePreserveArrayAccessIndex(Value *Base, unsigned Dimension,
> unsigned LastIndex)
> to
> Value *CreatePreserveArrayAccessIndex(Value *Base, unsigned Dimension,
> unsigned LastIndex, MDNode
> *DbgInfo)
> and the clang patch uses this newly changed function.
>
> Any recommendation on what is the best practice to merge such llvm/clang
> inter-dependent patches?
If you are using a git clone of llvm-project, then I would commit both to
master and then do a single 'git llvm push' to send both patches at once.
Because it's a single update, there should be no build breakage.
If you are using SVN, our usual advice is to switch to git. :-)
Actually the historical advice would be to commit the llvm part first
and then the clang part immediately afterward, in order to commit the
dependent changes "bottom up."
--paulr
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yonghong
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list