[llvm-dev] OpenJDK8 failed to work after compiled by LLVM 8 for X86
Martin Buchholz via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 12 05:12:01 PDT 2018
Hi Leslie,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Leslie Zhai <zhaixiang at loongson.cn> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
>
> 在 2018年09月12日 19:47, Martin Buchholz 写道:
>>
>> I tend to think that clang's optimization was valid, and if placing
>> data into .rodata has any value at all (why else does .rodata exist?)
>
> placing data into .rodata is *not* wrong! But it needs to double check the
> setter of isReadOnly() if condition in the
> llvm/lib/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp and
> llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringObjectFileImpl.cpp
I'm not a compiler engineer but .... The bug report should make it
clear why the new clang behavior is wrong. I want const globals to be
put into .rodata whenever possible - I WANT to get a segmentation
fault when placement new is used with the address of a const global.
> Thanks,
> Leslie Zhai
>
>
>> then the optimization is valuable.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:10 AM, Leslie Zhai <zhaixiang at loongson.cn>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Reported https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38911
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Leslie Zhai
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 2018年09月11日 16:55, Dimitry Andric 写道:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Leslie,
>>>>
>>>> The problem really lies in the OpenJDK code, as it is attempting to
>>>> write to a const object. If this seems to work with certain compiler(s)
>>>> and optimization settings, it is just luck. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Here is a reduced example, which shows the issue:
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>> #include <new>
>>>>
>>>> class NativeCallStack {
>>>> public:
>>>> static const NativeCallStack EMPTY_STACK;
>>>>
>>>> private:
>>>> enum { DEPTH = 4 };
>>>> void* stack[DEPTH];
>>>>
>>>> public:
>>>> NativeCallStack() {
>>>> for (int i = 0; i < DEPTH; ++i) {
>>>> stack[i] = nullptr;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> const NativeCallStack NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK;
>>>>
>>>> int main(void)
>>>> {
>>>> // The following should segfault, if EMPTY_STACK was placed into
>>>> .rodata.
>>>> ::new ((void*)&NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK) NativeCallStack();
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> clang 7.0.0 rc2 produces this assembly:
>>>>
>>>> .globl main # -- Begin function main
>>>> .p2align 4, 0x90
>>>> .type main, at function
>>>> main: # @main
>>>> .cfi_startproc
>>>> # %bb.0: # %entry
>>>> pushq %rbp
>>>> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
>>>> .cfi_offset %rbp, -16
>>>> movq %rsp, %rbp
>>>> .cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
>>>> xorps %xmm0, %xmm0
>>>> movups %xmm0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+16(%rip)
>>>> movups %xmm0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(%rip)
>>>> xorl %eax, %eax
>>>> popq %rbp
>>>> .cfi_def_cfa %rsp, 8
>>>> retq
>>>> .Lfunc_end0:
>>>> .size main, .Lfunc_end0-main
>>>> .cfi_endproc
>>>> # -- End function
>>>> .type NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK, at object #
>>>> @NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK
>>>> .section .rodata,"a", at progbits
>>>> .globl NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK
>>>> .p2align 3
>>>> NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK:
>>>> .zero 32
>>>> .size NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK, 32
>>>>
>>>> The whole constructor has been optimized out, and EMPTY_STACK has been
>>>> replaced by .zero 32, placed in the .rodata segment, which is a
>>>> perfectly valid transformation.
>>>>
>>>> Then, in main(), an attempt is made to write to that read-only segment,
>>>> which will usually segfault, depending on how strictly the underlying
>>>> operating system enforces these protections.
>>>>
>>>> In contrast, gcc 8.2.0 produces:
>>>>
>>>> .globl main
>>>> .type main, @function
>>>> main:
>>>> .LFB74:
>>>> .cfi_startproc
>>>> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(%rip)
>>>> xorl %eax, %eax
>>>> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+8(%rip)
>>>> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+16(%rip)
>>>> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+24(%rip)
>>>> ret
>>>> .cfi_endproc
>>>> .LFE74:
>>>> .size main, .-main
>>>> .p2align 4,,15
>>>> .type _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE,
>>>> @function
>>>> _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE:
>>>> .LFB76:
>>>> .cfi_startproc
>>>> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(%rip)
>>>> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+8(%rip)
>>>> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+16(%rip)
>>>> movq $0, NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK+24(%rip)
>>>> ret
>>>> .cfi_endproc
>>>> .LFE76:
>>>> .size _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE,
>>>> .-_GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
>>>> .section .ctors,"aw", at progbits
>>>> .align 8
>>>> .quad _GLOBAL__sub_I__ZN15NativeCallStack11EMPTY_STACKE
>>>> .globl NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK
>>>> .bss
>>>> .align 32
>>>> .type NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK, @object
>>>> .size NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK, 32
>>>> NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK:
>>>> .zero 32
>>>>
>>>> Here you can see that gcc decided to not place EMPTY_STACK in .rodata,
>>>> but in .bss, which is read/write. It adds the global constructor to
>>>> the .ctors section, so the dynamic linker is made responsible for
>>>> calling it.
>>>>
>>>> Note that now the EMPTY_STACK object is unnecessarily initialized twice,
>>>> once by the global constructor, and once in main.
>>>>
>>>> -Dimitry
>>>>
>>>>> On 11 Sep 2018, at 03:38, Leslie Zhai <zhaixiang at loongson.cn> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Dimitry,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your kind response!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the commit message of Jung's patch, I found that the bug
>>>>> had
>>>>> been fixed in OpenJDK 12 by Zhengyu
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205965 But only backported
>>>>> to 11.
>>>>> So Jung could backport it for OpenJDK 8, thanks a lot!
>>>>>
>>>>> But I argue that the root cause might be in the compiler side, why
>>>>> clang-3.9.1, gcc-6.4.1 couldn't reproduce the bug? And it might be
>>>>> work for
>>>>> clang-4.0 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208494 I will test
>>>>> LLVM
>>>>> 5 to check out whether or not reproducible.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 在 2018年09月11日 00:59, Dimitry Andric 写道:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Leslie,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is likely the same problem as was reported in
>>>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/225054#c8, and fixed by the following patch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/java/openjdk8/files/patch-hotspot_src_share_vm_services_memTracker.cpp?view=markup&pathrev=459368
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please try that out, and see if it fixes it for you too?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Dimitry
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10 Sep 2018, at 18:20, Leslie Zhai via llvm-dev
>>>>>>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OpenJDK8 jdk8u-dev[1] is just able to work after compiled with LLVM
>>>>>>> 3.9.1 for X86:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-slowdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java
>>>>>>> -version
>>>>>>> openjdk version "1.8.0-internal-debug"
>>>>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
>>>>>>> 1.8.0-internal-debug-xiangzhai_2018_09_09_21_08-b00)
>>>>>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.71-b00-debug, mixed mode)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ strings
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-slowdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java |
>>>>>>> grep clang
>>>>>>> clang version 3.9.1 (tags/RELEASE_391/final)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it failed to work after compiled with LLVM 8 for X86:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java
>>>>>>> -version
>>>>>>> Segmentation fault
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ gdb --ex run --args
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java
>>>>>>> -version
>>>>>>> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 7.12.1-48.fc25
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Starting program:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /home/xiangzhai/project/jdk8u-llvm/build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/images/j2sdk-image/bin/java
>>>>>>> -version
>>>>>>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>>>>>>> Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>>>>>> [ Legend: Modified register | Code | Heap | Stack | String ]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[
>>>>>>> registers ]────
>>>>>>> $rax : 0x0
>>>>>>> $rbx : 0x0
>>>>>>> $rcx : 0x7ffff7315eb0 → 0x00007ffff6ae30a0 →
>>>>>>> <NativeCallStack::print_on(outputStream*)+0> xor edx, edx
>>>>>>> $rdx : 0x0
>>>>>>> $rsp : 0x7fffffff9328 → 0x00007ffff6a76822 →
>>>>>>> <MemTracker::init_tracking_level()+178> mov edi, ebx
>>>>>>> $rbp : 0x7fffffff93c0 → 0x00007fffffff94f0 →
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9510 → 0x0000000000000002
>>>>>>> $rsi : 0x0
>>>>>>> $rdi : 0x7ffff7315e70 → 0x00007ffff7315eb0 →
>>>>>>> 0x00007ffff6ae30a0 → <NativeCallStack::print_on(outputStream*)+0>
>>>>>>> xor edx,
>>>>>>> edx
>>>>>>> $rip : 0x7ffff6ae2f5b →
>>>>>>> <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov QWORD PTR [rdi], rcx
>>>>>>> $r8 : 0x1
>>>>>>> $r9 : 0xf
>>>>>>> $r10 : 0x64
>>>>>>> $r11 : 0x0
>>>>>>> $r12 : 0x7fffffffdc88 → 0x00007fffffffe04c →
>>>>>>> "/home/xiangzhai/project/jdk8u-llvm/build/linux-x86[...]"
>>>>>>> $r13 : 0x7fffffffdca0 → 0x00007fffffffe0bf → "XDG_VTNR=1"
>>>>>>> $r14 : 0x7fffffff9330 → "NMT_LEVEL_10535"
>>>>>>> $r15 : 0x6
>>>>>>> $eflags: [carry parity adjust zero sign trap INTERRUPT direction
>>>>>>> overflow RESUME virtualx86 identification]
>>>>>>> $ss: 0x002b $ds: 0x0000 $cs: 0x0033 $es: 0x0000 $gs: 0x0000 $fs:
>>>>>>> 0x0000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[
>>>>>>> stack ]────
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9328│+0x00: 0x00007ffff6a76822 →
>>>>>>> <MemTracker::init_tracking_level()+178> mov edi, ebx ← $rsp
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9330│+0x08: "NMT_LEVEL_10535" ← $r14
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9338│+0x10: 0x0035333530315f4c ("L_10535"?)
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9340│+0x18: 0x0000000000000001
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9348│+0x20: 0x0000000000602190 → 0x00007ffff5eb7000 →
>>>>>>> 0x00010102464c457f
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9350│+0x28: 0x0000000000000004
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9358│+0x30: 0x000000066474e551
>>>>>>> 0x00007fffffff9360│+0x38: 0x0000000000000000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[
>>>>>>> code:i386:x86-64 ]────
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f4b <print_owned_locks_on_error(outputStream*)+187>
>>>>>>> add
>>>>>>> eax, 0x1f0f00
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f50 <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov
>>>>>>> rcx, QWORD PTR [rip+0x842781] # 0x7ffff73256d8
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f57 <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> add
>>>>>>> rcx, 0x10
>>>>>>> → 0x7ffff6ae2f5b <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov
>>>>>>> QWORD PTR [rdi], rcx
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f5e <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov
>>>>>>> DWORD PTR [rdi+0x28], 0x0
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f65 <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> add
>>>>>>> rdi, 0x8
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f69 <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> test
>>>>>>> edx, edx
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f6b <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> je
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f7b <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int, bool)+43>
>>>>>>> 0x7ffff6ae2f6d <NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int,+0> mov
>>>>>>> eax, esi
>>>>>>> ─────────[
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> source:/home/xiangzhai/project/jdk8u-llvm/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/nativeCallStack.cpp+33
>>>>>>> ]────
>>>>>>> 28 #include "utilities/nativeCallStack.hpp"
>>>>>>> 29
>>>>>>> 30 const NativeCallStack NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK(0,
>>>>>>> false);
>>>>>>> 31
>>>>>>> 32 NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(int toSkip, bool
>>>>>>> fillStack)
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> → 33 _hash_value(0) {
>>>>>>> 34
>>>>>>> 35 #if !PLATFORM_NATIVE_STACK_WALKING_SUPPORTED
>>>>>>> 36 fillStack = false;
>>>>>>> 37 #endif
>>>>>>> 38
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[
>>>>>>> threads ]────
>>>>>>> [#0] Id 1, Name: "java", stopped, reason: SIGSEGV
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[
>>>>>>> trace ]────
>>>>>>> [#0] 0x7ffff6ae2f5b → Name:
>>>>>>> NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack(this=0x7ffff7315e70
>>>>>>> <NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK>, toSkip=0x0, fillStack=0x0)
>>>>>>> [#1] 0x7ffff6a76822 → Name: MemTracker::init_tracking_level()
>>>>>>> [#2] 0x7ffff62eff49 → Name: MemTracker::tracking_level()
>>>>>>> [#3] 0x7ffff62eff49 → Name: ResourceObj::operator new(size=0x20,
>>>>>>> type=ResourceObj::STACK_OR_EMBEDDED, flags=<optimized out>)
>>>>>>> [#4] 0x7ffff61369ec → Name: _GLOBAL__sub_I_c1_Greedy.cpp()
>>>>>>> [#5] 0x7ffff7de7d9a → Name: call_init(l=<optimized out>, argc=0x2,
>>>>>>> argv=0x7fffffffdc88, env=0x7fffffffdca0)
>>>>>>> [#6] 0x7ffff7de7eab → Name: call_init(env=0x7fffffffdca0,
>>>>>>> argv=0x7fffffffdc88, argc=0x2, l=<optimized out>)
>>>>>>> [#7] 0x7ffff7de7eab → Name: _dl_init(main_map=0x602190, argc=0x2,
>>>>>>> argv=0x7fffffffdc88, env=0x7fffffffdca0)
>>>>>>> [#8] 0x7ffff7dece46 → Name: dl_open_worker(a=0x7fffffff97e0)
>>>>>>> [#9] 0x7ffff7de7c44 → Name: _dl_catch_error(objname=0x7fffffff97d0,
>>>>>>> errstring=0x7fffffff97d8, mallocedp=0x7fffffff97cf,
>>>>>>> operate=0x7ffff7decae0
>>>>>>> <dl_open_worker>, args=0x7fffffff97e0)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
>>>>>>> 0x00007ffff6ae2f5b in NativeCallStack::NativeCallStack
>>>>>>> (this=0x7ffff7315e70 <NativeCallStack::EMPTY_STACK>, toSkip=0x0,
>>>>>>> fillStack=0x0) at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /home/xiangzhai/project/jdk8u-llvm/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/nativeCallStack.cpp:33
>>>>>>> 33 _hash_value(0) {
>>>>>>> gef➤ c
>>>>>>> Continuing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>>>>>> The program no longer exists.
>>>>>>> gef➤
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8<
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I started to use and contribute clang static analyzer[2] just for
>>>>>>> finding the bugs for open source software from LLVM 3.x, perhaps it
>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>> bug of LLVM 8, because jdk8u is just able to print out '-version'
>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>> compiled with llvm-3.9.1, I will rebuild the LLVM 8 again, then
>>>>>>> rebuild
>>>>>>> jdk8u for triple check.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Workaround-compile-with-llvm.patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xiangzhai/jdk8u-dev/master/Workaround-compile-with-llvm.patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/commit/a530e823ed2793ac149de7a984014e242a787682#diff-ff9160d4628cb9b6186559837c2c8668
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. The build option of LLVM 8 (bootstrap with LLVM 3.9.1):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
>>>>>>> -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang \
>>>>>>> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ \
>>>>>>> -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-fPIC" \
>>>>>>> -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-std=c++11 -fPIC" \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_INSTALL_UTILS=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_FFI=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_EH=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_BUILD_TESTS=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_BUILD_DOCS=OFF \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_SPHINX=OFF \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_DOXYGEN=OFF \
>>>>>>> -DLLDB_DISABLE_LIBEDIT=1 \
>>>>>>> -DSPHINX_WARNINGS_AS_ERRORS=OFF \
>>>>>>> -DFFI_INCLUDE_DIR=$(pkg-config --variable=includedir libffi) \
>>>>>>> -DFFI_LIBRARY_DIR:PATH="$(pkg-config --variable=libdir libffi)"
>>>>>>> \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_BINUTILS_INCDIR=/usr/include \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX=64 \
>>>>>>> -DLIBCXX_ENABLE_ABI_LINKER_SCRIPT=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLIBUNWIND_ENABLE_SHARED=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER=ON \
>>>>>>> -DLLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER=clang \
>>>>>>> -DLLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ \
>>>>>>> -DLLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE="x86_64-redhat-linux" \
>>>>>>> -DCLANG_VENDOR="LLVM China"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. $ clang -v
>>>>>>> LLVM China clang version 8.0.0 (git at github.com:llvm-mirror/clang.git
>>>>>>> 81ef98628ebf5186d746c0986dcbf5073e842043)
>>>>>>> (git at github.com:llvm-mirror/llvm.git
>>>>>>> e1aac9723d55497e74d83d216329f08d9842e494) (based on LLVM 8.0.0svn)
>>>>>>> Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
>>>>>>> Thread model: posix
>>>>>>> InstalledDir: /usr/bin
>>>>>>> Found candidate GCC installation:
>>>>>>> /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>>>>> Found candidate GCC installation:
>>>>>>> /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>>>>> Found candidate GCC installation:
>>>>>>> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>>>>> Found candidate GCC installation:
>>>>>>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>>>>> Selected GCC installation:
>>>>>>> /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.4.1
>>>>>>> Candidate multilib: .;@m64
>>>>>>> Candidate multilib: 32;@m32
>>>>>>> Selected multilib: .;@m64
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Leslie Zhai
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Leslie Zhai
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list