[llvm-dev] [RFR] JDK-8156980: Hotspot build doesn't have -std=gnu++98 gcc option
Leslie Zhai via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 5 18:17:32 PDT 2018
It might be UBSan false positive :) What about ASan?
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189800
在 2018年09月06日 09:12, Martin Buchholz 写道:
> it's difficult to use llvm tools like sanitizers on openjdk sources,
> because of the "cheating" - relying on undefined behavior, and the JIT.
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Leslie Zhai <zhaixiang at loongson.cn
> <mailto:zhaixiang at loongson.cn>> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
> I haven't tested compiling OpenJDK 12-dev with LLVM toolchain,
> perhaps the issue had been fixed already, because clang treat
> invalid argument '-std=gnu++98' not allowed with 'C' as error. It
> is better only apply EXTRA_CFLAGS to C without EXTRA_CXXFLAGS.
>
> Furthermore, I just have interest, did you use clang analyzer,
> sanitizer and libfuzzer towards hotspot and jdk native library?
> Thanks!
>
>
> 在 2018年09月06日 02:10, Martin Buchholz 写道:
>
> We seem to have some confusion about flags for C vs. flags for
> C++. Most flags for most toolchains apply to both C and C++,
> so it's understandable that we want to unify them. But some
> flags, notably -std, are language-specific. We have both
> EXTRA_CFLAGS and EXTRA_CXXFLAGS, so we should expect
> EXTRA_CFLAGS to only apply to C.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Leslie Zhai
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Leslie Zhai
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list