[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Move Virtual File System from clang to llvm

[Richard Smith via llvm-dev]

Sounds fine to me.

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, 08:25 Jonas Devlieghere via cfe-dev, <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm working on adding reproducers to LLDB [0] and I'd like to use clang's
> virtual file system (VFS), similar to how it is used today for reproducers
> in
> clang. I believe the functionality is generic enough that it warrants
> living in
> support, next to the "real" file system. I can imagine that other tools
> might
> benefit from this functionality as well.
>
> I created a patch [1] to show what this would look like. Most of the
> changes
> are the result of the vfs now living in the llvm namespace.
>
> What do you think?
>
> [0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-September/014184.html
> [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D52783
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20181003/5a49e544/attachment.html>