[llvm-dev] llvm-mc-assemble-fuzzer broken

[Davide Italiano via llvm-dev]

Thank you.
I went ahead with a speculative fix in r331568.
I'm not familiar _at all_ with the tool, so, although the fix was
straightforward, another pair of eyes from somebody familiar with the
tool would be appreciated.

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:10 PM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> wrote:
> It worked in August.
> Last time I’ve asked (again, in August) someone did seem to care,
> but it is inevitable it would bitrot if it’s not built in any of the bots.
>
> George
>
>> On May 4, 2018, at 2:53 PM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> While playing with sanitizer in a downstream project, I found out this.
>>
>> /Users/davide/work/llvm-monorepo/llvm-project-20170507/llvm/tools/llvm-mc-assemble-fuzzer/llvm-mc-assemble-fuzzer.cpp:207:32:
>> error: reference to type 'std::unique_ptr<MCCodeEmitter>' could not
>> bind to an
>> lvalue of type 'llvm::MCCodeEmitter *'
>>        UseDwarfDirectory, IP, CE, MAB, ShowInst));
>>                               ^~
>> /Users/davide/work/llvm-monorepo/llvm-project-20170507/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:514:66:
>> note: passing argument to parameter 'CE' here
>>                                std::unique_ptr<MCCodeEmitter> &&CE,
>>                                                                 ^
>> /Users/davide/work/llvm-monorepo/llvm-project-20170507/llvm/tools/llvm-mc-assemble-fuzzer/llvm-mc-assemble-fuzzer.cpp:232:55:
>> error: too many arguments to function call, expected 3, have 4
>>                                                      MCOptions);
>>                                                      ^~~~~~~~~
>> /Users/davide/work/llvm-monorepo/llvm-project-20170507/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:401:3:
>> note: 'createMCAsmBackend' declared here
>>  MCAsmBackend *createMCAsmBackend(const MCSubtargetInfo &STI,
>>  ^
>> 2 errors generated.
>>
>> Apparently, this has been broken for several months. I think I can fix
>> this particular instance, but I was wondering whether anybody cares
>> about this tool?
>>
>> --
>> Davide
>>
>> "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more
>> or less solved" -- Henri Poincare
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>



-- 
Davide

"There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more
or less solved" -- Henri Poincare