[llvm-dev] Heap Exhaustion during 'DAGCombiner::Run'
Nemanja Ivanovic via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 6 14:29:53 PST 2018
We do something very similar in the PPC back end. The ISA has a general
vector permute (vperm) that any shuffle can be lowered to. But there are
also a bunch of specialized permutes that don't require materializing a
permute control vector. So what we actually do is a custom legalization for
shuffles where we will lower shuffles to various PPC-specific ISD nodes,
etc.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Nirav Davé via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Martin:
>
> It sounds like you are doing is more akin to shuffle selection than fusion
> and therefore it's a better fit for instruction selection than
> DAGCombining. Try movign it to <Target>ISelDAGToDAG's Select (or
> potentially PreprocessISelDAG).
>
> Th
>
> -Nirav
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:05 PM Martin J. O'Riordan <MartinO at theheart.ie>
> wrote:
>
>> We discovered what is happening.
>>
>>
>>
>> SDAGCombiner essentially looks at various combinations of nodes to do
>> with vectors, and when it can, it creates a vector shuffle. The problem
>> is, that our vector shuffle lowering builds new trees with vector element,
>> or vector sub-vector insert sequences. The generic DAGCombiner,
>> reconstructs these into a new shuffle, and so the loop continues - we
>> reduce it, and DAGCombiner re-abstracts it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Our shuffle lowering produces (produced) very optimal code sequences for
>> our target, and has not been changed significantly since LLVM v3.4; but
>> changes between v5.0 and v6.0 have introduced this DAG reduction dependency
>> loop.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there any advice to Out-of-Tree implementations about how to re-write
>> their lowering code for shuffle so as to avoid this kind of infinite
>> dependency coupling?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> MartinO
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Nirav Davé [mailto:niravd at google.com]
>> *Sent:* 01 March 2018 20:45
>> *To:* MartinO at theheart.ie
>> *Cc:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Heap Exhaustion during 'DAGCombiner::Run'
>>
>>
>>
>> Martin:
>>
>>
>>
>> I suspect this is an issue with post-DAG legalization store merging in
>> the DAGCombiner. If you have a custom lowered type the DAGCombiner may end
>> up merging a set of stores and immediately splitting them up in
>> legalization. You should be able to disable this pass universally by
>> overriding mergeStoresAfterLegalization() or conditionally for cases that
>> shouldn't match with canMergeStoresTo.
>>
>>
>>
>> You should able able to verify by finding the loop of nodes considered
>> with "-debug" on.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Nirav
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:36 AM Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi LLVM-Devs,
>>
>> I am in the process of updating our out-of-tree implementation from v5.0
>> to
>> v6.0 RC3, and while it builds and mostly runs, I am having trouble with a
>> small number of tests where the 'WorklistMap' in 'DAGCombiner::Run' never
>> becomes empty. This is resulting in a runaway state of continuous heap
>> allocation until the process exhausts all system memory.
>>
>> But I can't get a handle on why it is doing this, and it is not obvious to
>> me that the changes between v5.0 and v6.0 RC3 invalidate our
>> implementation
>> in a way that might cause this. The only time I see our code entered is
>> when lowering is called for vector element insert by 'LegalizeOp'. Does
>> anybody have an advice on how I should approach debugging this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> MartinO
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180306/ef38a340/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list