[llvm-dev] RFC: Bug-closing protocol
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 12 08:59:43 PDT 2018
I did ping one, with no answer. There have been dozens in the past few days. I suppose I could have tried harder, but without something to point to it's my opinion versus somebody else's.
From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:50 AM
To: Robinson, Paul
Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Bug-closing protocol
Sounds reasonable to push back on these bug closings (for instance by replying to the bugs/reopening them and asking for clarification) - not sure it warrants a particularly documented policy, but I don't much mind either way.
On Tue., 12 Jun. 2018, 7:51 am via llvm-dev, <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
TL;DR: It's okay to close a bug, if you can justify it properly.
Recently there has been a spate of bug-closing with what I would call
inadequate documentation. Comments such as "Obsolete?" or "I assume
it's fixed" could be applied to nearly every open bug we have. While
this does reduce the open bug count--something I have been watching
with morbid fascination for years--I do fear that the reduction is
potentially artificial, and incorrectly puts the onus on the original
bug author to reopen the case.
I suggest that closing a bug can be done IF AND ONLY IF you also state
one of the following:
- that revision NNNNNN actually fixed the bug
- that the bug cannot be reproduced with revision NNNNNN
- that the circumstances for the bug don't apply anymore; e.g.,
"This is about the makefiles and we don't use makefiles anymore."
- sound reasons for not fixing something (WONTFIX)
- some specific and plausible reason to think that a given bug is
otherwise inapplicable or obsolete
In particular, "Obsolete?" and "I assume it's fixed" are NOT enough
justification to close a bug.
If people are okay with this, I'd expect adding a new section to the
Developer Policy is probably the right place to put it.
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev