[llvm-dev] Size optimization with gold linker

[Sean Silva via llvm-dev]

There are two independent sets of "-O<x>" options:


1. The gcc/clang options -O[0-3sz]

These include -O0 to -O3 and -Os (optimize for size) and -Oz (attempt to
achieve minimum size, even at significant runtime cost). These options
affect the compiler's optimizer. For example, they affect things like
inlining and unrolling where performance can often be significantly
increased at the cost of code size.

2. The ld/gold/lld options -O[0-3]

As you found, these range from -O0 to -O3 and control features like linker
string merging and tail duplication that tend to save some binary size.
There is no -Os or -Oz since, unlike the compiler, the linker only does
size optimizations (whereas the compiler has to balance performance against
code size).


So to answer your question, the fact that there is no `-Os` for gold is as
intended.


FWIW, if you are trying to save on code size, consider also passing
`-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections` to clang/gcc when compiling your .cpp
files and then pass `--gc-sections --icf=all` to gold/lld.

-- Sean Silva



On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Muhui Jiang via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> When I use -flto -fuse-ld=gold to force clang to use gold as the linker. I
> found gold doesn't support the optimization flag -Os. It says that the flag
> must between 0-3.
>
> Does anyone know how to use size optimization with gold linker? Many
> Thanks.
>
> Regards
> Muhui
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180707/ed96a5a6/attachment.html>