[llvm-dev] coro transformations insert unreachable in destroy fn?
Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Feb 28 15:18:46 PST 2018
Found the problem.
Instead of the Return block I needed to use the Suspend block, which has
the llvm.coro.end in it.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have this input IR in the final cleanup block of my coroutine:
>
> // call the free function
> call fastcc void %22(%Allocator* %20, %"[]u8"* byval %4), !dbg !244
>
> // based on whether this is an early return or a normal return, we want to
> // either return to the caller, or resume the handle of the awaiter
> br i1 %19, label %Resume, label %Return, !dbg !244
>
> Resume: ; preds = %CheckFree
> %31 = load i8*, i8** %14, align 8, !dbg !244
> call void @llvm.coro.resume(i8* %31), !dbg !244
>
> // after resuming the awaiter, we return to the caller
> br label %Return, !dbg !244
>
> Return: ; preds = %Resume,
> %CheckFree
> ret i8* undef, !dbg !244
>
>
> When CoroSplit creates the destroy function for this coroutine, it
> generates this:
>
> call fastcc void %2(%Allocator* %0, %"[]u8"* byval %.reload.addr4), !dbg
> !296
> unreachable
>
>
> How did that unreachable get there? What happened to my code above to
> resume or return to the caller?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180228/c2884d08/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list